Parallel Computing Paradigms for Next-Gen AGI

chevron-icon
RFP Proposals
Top
chevron-icon
project-presentation-img
user-profile-img
Accelflare
Project Owner

Parallel Computing Paradigms for Next-Gen AGI

Expert Rating

n/a

Overview

This project explores next-generation computing paradigms—such as analog, temporal, and in-memory architectures—for accelerating symbolic AGI systems. Through structured evaluation and benchmarking, we aim to identify architectures capable of supporting parallel symbolic workloads in reasoning, inference, and attention mechanisms. Using our Symbolic AGI Toolkit and CQ Tester, we will assess feasibility, performance, and integration potential. Outcomes will include research insights, benchmark criteria, and a prototype demonstration aligned with AGI development goals.

RFP Guidelines

Explore novel hardware architectures and computing paradigms for AGI

Complete & Awarded
  • Type SingularityNET RFP
  • Total RFP Funding $80,000 USD
  • Proposals 9
  • Awarded Projects 1
author-img
SingularityNET
Apr. 14, 2025

The purpose of this RFP is to identify, assess, and experiment with novel computing paradigms that could enhance AGI system performance and efficiency. By focusing on alternative architectures, this research aims to overcome computational bottlenecks in recursive reasoning, probabilistic inference, attention allocation, and large-scale knowledge representation. Bids are expected to range from $40,000 - $80,000.

Proposal Description

Company Name (if applicable)

Accelflare.com

Project details

Parallel Computing Paradigms for Next-Gen AGI


🧠 Overview

The future of Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) demands not only algorithmic innovation but also foundational changes in the hardware architectures that support symbolic reasoning, recursive inference, and cognitive adaptability. This project aims to systematically explore non-traditional and emerging hardware paradigms capable of delivering parallelism, efficiency, and scalability beyond what is achievable with current architectures.

We focus on the development and evaluation of alternative computing models—specifically analog computing, in-memory processing, temporal logic, and race logic systems—for their potential in supporting symbolic AGI systems built upon frameworks like Hyperon and MeTTa.

This proposal is backed by our established platforms, the Symbolic AGI Toolkit and the CQ Tester, which together offer symbolic test environments, FSM/Regex pipelines, cognitive state representations, and feedback-driven motivation systems. These tools will be leveraged to model AGI workloads and test how emerging hardware paradigms cope with symbolic execution, memory transformation, and multi-agent goal regulation.


🔍 Problem Space and Motivation

Conventional computing platforms (CPU/GPU/TPU) are inherently limited in symbolic concurrency and memory-driven feedback processing. AGI frameworks that incorporate attention mechanisms, recursive memory updating, and high-fidelity symbolic knowledge graphs demand massive symbolic throughput with energy-efficient, low-latency access to dynamically evolving state spaces.

This project will determine the feasibility and promise of parallel symbolic processing across emerging paradigms, evaluating how they:

  • Scale in response to symbolic feedback-driven learning,

  • Process FSM-based transitions and Regex queries in parallel,

  • Manage large-scale cognitive state evolution (D-K-R structures),

  • Align with MeTTa-based execution and Hyperon-style attention networks.


🔬 Research Goals

  1. Identify viable computing paradigms beyond digital silicon that can support symbolic logic structures, particularly those that can simulate or execute FSM chains and Regex interpretations natively or efficiently.

  2. Benchmark their cognitive suitability across representative AGI tasks: recursive reasoning, probabilistic feedback cycles, and parallel attention flows.

  3. Prototype at least one system with partial implementation of symbolic cognitive routines (e.g., FSM traversal or Regex filtering across attention graphs).

  4. Evaluate symbolic architecture fit—how well do the explored paradigms serve key AGI building blocks such as:

    • MeTTa symbolic ruleset processing

    • D-K-R state loops from CQ Tester

    • Goal-shift logic from CQ-based motivational agents


⚙️ Methodological Framework

Our research methodology involves:

  • Symbolic encoding of AGI tasks using the Symbolic AGI Toolkit and CQ Tester

  • Translation of these symbolic programs into a minimal FSM and Regex model

  • Execution (or simulation) of these models across various paradigms via co-design or hardware prototyping

  • Measurement of symbolic throughput, latency, concurrency, and energy cost

  • Evaluation against MeTTa interpreters, ECAN resource flow models, and DAS-like attention-memory integrations

All comparisons will be quantitative (performance, energy, concurrency) and qualitative (symbolic alignment, compatibility, generalizability).


📘 Milestone Structure

Milestone 1: Identification of Hardware Paradigms and Research Plan (25%)

  • Map symbolic execution models to hardware paradigms

  • Design experimental goals, cognitive workloads, and selection criteria

Milestone 2: Literature Review and Benchmarking Criteria (25%)

  • Focused review on analog, in-memory, temporal, and race logic systems

  • Formalize benchmarking criteria using FSM/Regex pipelines and CQ agent behaviors

Milestone 3: Initial Experiments and Feasibility Testing (25%)

  • Simulate or co-design hardware logic for AGI symbolic routines

  • Analyze symbolic task performance, bottlenecks, and hardware fit

Milestone 4: Final Evaluation and Prototype Demonstration (25%)

  • Present best-fit architecture for AGI symbolic acceleration

  • Deliver small-scale prototype and integration concept for MeTTa + ECAN loop


🌐 Integration Path & Broader Impact

This project contributes directly to decentralized, transparent AGI development by mapping symbolic cognition workloads onto novel physical substrates. Our findings will lay the groundwork for building next-generation interpretable AGI accelerators. The deliverables will also shape future iterations of Hyperon/MeTTa-compatible hardware.

Open Source Licensing

Custom

© 2025 Accelflare. All rights reserved.

This work is released under a restricted-access dual license:

🔍 Research Use:  
Permitted for non-commercial research and academic evaluation, with attribution. Derivative works must remain open and traceable.

💼 Commercial Use:  
All commercial use—including integration into proprietary systems or monetized platforms—requires a separate licensing agreement. Contact: licensing@accelflare.com

No resale, sublicensing, or redistribution allowed without written consent.

Proposal Video

Not Avaliable Yet

Check back later during the Feedback & Selection period for the RFP that is proposal is applied to.

  • Total Milestones

    4

  • Total Budget

    $40,000 USD

  • Last Updated

    13 May 2025

Milestone 1 - Paradigm Selection & Research Design

Description

Hardware Paradigm Mapping & AGI Task Alignment: Survey and select candidate hardware paradigms (e.g. analog in-memory temporal race logic). Design a research strategy that maps AGI symbolic workloads—including recursive reasoning FSM chains and Regex interpretation—onto these paradigms.

Deliverables

Detailed research plan Symbolic task catalog and alignment matrix Diagram of AGI task flow mapped to each hardware paradigm

Budget

$10,000 USD

Success Criterion

Comprehensive justification for each paradigm’s relevance Clearly defined benchmarking methodology Approval-ready roadmap for experimentation

Milestone 2 - Literature Review & Benchmark Criteria

Description

Symbolic Hardware Suitability & Benchmarking Metrics: Conduct an in-depth literature review of the selected paradigms focused on symbolic execution attention shifts and recursive inference. Define benchmark metrics for evaluating symbolic processing across AGI workloads.

Deliverables

Annotated literature summary Benchmarking matrix (performance scalability symbolic traceability) Symbolic task simulation scenarios

Budget

$10,000 USD

Success Criterion

At least 4 paradigms deeply analyzed Formal benchmark definitions for FSM/Regex/CQ tasks Validation-ready testing criteria for Milestone 3

Milestone 3 - Simulation & Feasibility Testing

Description

Symbolic Execution Simulations and Feasibility Trials: Build simulation environments or use hardware-software co-design tools to evaluate AGI-relevant tasks under each paradigm. Focus on task fidelity performance efficiency and symbolic integrity.

Deliverables

FSM/Regex/CQ test execution logs Symbolic task graphs before/after execution Performance and symbolic consistency reports

Budget

$10,000 USD

Success Criterion

Successful symbolic task simulation on at least two paradigms Feasibility ratings based on benchmark metrics Evidence of symbolic traceability through execution

Milestone 4 - Evaluation & Prototype Demonstration

Description

Comparative Review and AGI Integration Prototype: Synthesize findings into a comparative evaluation report. Build a prototype or symbolic proof-of-concept demonstrating how one selected paradigm can accelerate symbolic AGI tasks.

Deliverables

Final evaluation report with symbolic integration mapping Working prototype or co-simulation model Summary recommendations for future AGI hardware research

Budget

$10,000 USD

Success Criterion

Prototype demonstrates successful symbolic execution Paradigm shown to improve AGI task throughput or efficiency Deliverables suitable for future AGI infrastructure proposals

Join the Discussion (0)

Expert Ratings

Reviews & Ratings

    No Reviews Avaliable

    Check back later by refreshing the page.

Welcome to our website!

Nice to meet you! If you have any question about our services, feel free to contact us.