Abiodun Adegbajesu

Project Owner

ASI STUDIO:AI-Native Dev Environment for ASI:Chain

Expert Rating

n/a

Type SingularityNET RFP
Funding Request n/a
RFP Guidelines An AI-native Development Environment for the ASI:Chain

Details locked. Check back later to view.
Details locked.Check back later to view.
Details locked.Check back later to view.

Overview

This proposal develops an AI-native IDE that simplifies interaction with ASI:Chain through natural-language smart contract generation, deployment, and verification in a unified web interface. ASI Studio enables developers to create validated Rholang/CosmWasm contracts using plain-English vibecoding, with integrated ASI Wallet signing and real-time block explorer verification. Workflow: prompt → AI generates contract → connect wallet → deploy to DevNet → verify on-chain in minutes. Project demo URL:https://asi-studio-eight.vercel.app/ Deliverables: web IDE, demo app, documentation. Open source (MIT). Timeline: 12 weeks. Budget: $48,500.

RFP Guidelines

Open for Proposals

An AI-native Development Environment for...

Ending on:

13 Feb. 2026

Days

Hours

Minutes

Type SingularityNET RFP
Total RFP Funding $50,000 USD
Proposals 21
Awarded Projects n/a

SingularityNET

Feb. 4, 2026

View RFP

This RFP seeks proposals for the development of an AI-native Development Environment (IDE) that improves the efficiency and accessibility of blockchain application development for the ASI:Chain.

Proposal Description

Proposal Details Locked…

In order to protect this proposal from being copied, all details are hidden until the end of the submission period. Please come back later to see all details.

Total Milestones
4
Total Budget
$48,500_USD
Last Updated
13 Feb 2026

Milestone 1 - Foundation & AI Vibecoding Interface

Description

We build the core IDE shell and prove the AI generation pipeline works end-to-end. Week 1-2: React 18 + TypeScript app scaffold with Vite build pipeline Monaco Editor with Rholang syntax highlighting AI prompt interface (text input + sample prompts) LLM API integration (GPT-4 / Claude) Public GitHub repository live from Day 1 Initial 3 contract templates (token escrow registry) Week 3: RAG pipeline: ASI:Chain docs embedded into vector database Prompt → retrieval → LLM → code generation pipeline Inline code explanations auto-generated Iterative refinement (follow-up prompt modifications) Lightweight Node.js backend for API proxying Deployed to staging (Vercel)

Deliverables

Live publicly accessible staging URL where a developer can: Type a natural language prompt Receive a valid annotated Rholang smart contract grounded in ASI:Chain documentation Request modifications using follow-up prompts View generated code in Monaco Editor with full syntax highlighting

Budget

$13,000 USD

Success Criterion

GitHub repository is public with all code committed Evaluators can test the live staging URL independently Demo video (3–5 minutes) showing prompt → code generation workflow Weekly progress report submitted to Deep Funding

Milestone 2 - ASI Wallet Integration & Contract Validation

Description

We connect the ASI Wallet and implement full contract validation before deployment. Week 4-5: ASI Wallet SDK integration (browser extension + WalletConnect) Wallet connection modal with clear UX flow Display wallet address and ASI token balance in IDE header Zero private key custody — all signing client-side Abstraction layer for future wallet SDK updates Week 6: 3-layer contract validation pipeline: → Layer 1: Syntax validation (AST parser) → Layer 2: Security analysis (reentrancy overflow access control) → Layer 3: ASI:Chain compatibility check Inline validation results in Monaco Editor (errors + fix suggestions) Gas estimation display before deployment Deployment readiness checklist (wallet ✓ validated ✓ gas ✓) Contract template library expanded to 8 templates Full session logging enabled

Deliverables

Updated live staging URL where a developer can: Generate a validated Rholang contract using natural language Connect their ASI Wallet (browser extension or WalletConnect) View inline validation results with fix suggestions for any errors See gas estimation for deployment Reach the deployment readiness screen with all checks confirmed

Budget

$15,000 USD

Success Criterion

All code committed to public GitHub repository Evaluators can test wallet connection using their own ASI Wallet on staging URL Demo video (3–5 minutes) showing complete wallet connection + validation workflow Weekly progress report submitted to Deep Funding

Milestone 3 - DevNet Deployment & Block Explorer Integration

Description

Weeks 5–6 | 15000 (30%) We complete the full end-to-end pipeline — from validated contract to live on ASI:Chain DevNet visible in the block explorer. Week 7-8: ASI:Chain DevNet RPC integration (http://54.152.57.201:40453) Contract compilation pipeline (Rholang source → bytecode) One-click deployment with real-time status tracking Deployment states: Compiling → Submitting → Pending → Confirmed Gas estimation integrated with DevNet RPC Deployment history panel (address tx hash gas used timestamp) Week 9: Block Explorer API integration (explorer.dev.asichain.io) Deep linking: deployed contract auto-linked to explorer WebSocket subscriptions for live block confirmation updates Contract state inspection and event log viewer Post-deployment contract interaction panel Full end-to-end performance testing (target: <3 minutes total)

Deliverables

Complete end-to-end ASI Studio product where a developer can: Generate a smart contract using natural language Validate and review the contract Connect their ASI Wallet Deploy to ASI:Chain DevNet in one click View the deployed contract live in the block explorer Interact with the deployed contract from the IDE

Budget

$12,500 USD

Success Criterion

Production ASI Studio accessible at public URL AI Agent Service Registry demo contract live on ASI:Chain DevNet Complete documentation suite published Public walkthrough video (2–3 minutes) Open-source v1.0.0 release on GitHub under MIT License

Milestone 4 - Demo App Testing Documentation & Launch

Description

We ship production-ready software the ASI:Chain community can use immediately. Week 10-11: Deploy Demo App: AI Agent Service Registry on ASI:Chain DevNet → AI agents register with name service type ASI token pricing → Publicly verifiable contract address on block explorer Cross-browser testing: Chrome Firefox Safari Brave Edge case testing: invalid prompts network failures wallet rejections Performance benchmarking: load time generation time deployment time Week 12: Full documentation suite: → Getting Started Guide (5-minute onboarding) → API Reference Template Library Troubleshooting Guide → Architecture Overview + Contributing Guide 2–3 minute narrated demo video (YouTube/Loom publicly shared) Production deployment with custom domain MIT License applied GitHub tagged v1.0.0 Final project report submitted to Deep Funding

Deliverables

Budget

$8,000 USD

Success Criterion

Production URL is publicly accessible to all evaluators Demo contract address is publicly verifiable on ASI:Chain block explorer Documentation is complete and accessible Video is publicly available GitHub repository is tagged v1.0.0 under MIT License Final project report submitted to Deep Funding

Join the Discussion (0)

Expert Ratings

Reviews & Ratings

No Reviews Avaliable

Check back later by refreshing the page.

The weighted average of the 4 perspectives Overall

0.0
Each RFP defines a maximum allowed budget, but teams can differentiate their proposal by offering a solution with a lower budget or a wider scope.Value for money

0.0
This rating indicates compliance to 'Must haves' but also adaptation of 'Nice to haves' and Non-functional requirements defined in the RFP.Compliance with RFP requirements

0.0
RFPs will offer varying degrees of freedom. This rating indicates the quality of the team's specific solution ideas, the provided details, and the reviewer's confidence in the team's ability to execute.Solution details and team expertise

0.0

Review Headline

0 /50 chars

Review Summary

0 /5000 chars

The weighted average of the 4 perspectives Overall

0.0
Each RFP defines a maximum allowed budget, but teams can differentiate their proposal by offering a solution with a lower budget or a wider scope.Value for money

0.0
This rating indicates compliance to 'Must haves' but also adaptation of 'Nice to haves' and Non-functional requirements defined in the RFP.Compliance with RFP requirements

0.0
RFPs will offer varying degrees of freedom. This rating indicates the quality of the team's specific solution ideas, the provided details, and the reviewer's confidence in the team's ability to execute.Solution details and team expertise

0.0

Review Headline

0 /50 chars

0 /5000 chars

Warning: Adding final group rating for this project will prevent expert users from adding new or editing existing reviews

Reviews and Ratings in Deep Funding are structured in 4 categories. This will ensure that the reviewer takes all these perspectives into account in their assessment and it will make it easier to compare different projects on their strengths and weaknesses. Overall (Primary) This is an average of the 4 perspectives. At the start of this new process, we are assigning an equal weight to all categories, but over time we might change this and make some categories more important than others in the overall score. (This may even be done retroactively). Feasibility (secondary) This represents the user\'s assessment of whether the proposed project is theoretically possible and if it is deemed feasible. E.g. A proposal for nuclear fission might be theoretically possible, but it doesn’t look very feasible in the context of Deep Funding. Viability (secondary) This category is somewhat similar to Feasibility, but it interprets the feasibility against factors such as the size and experience of the team, the budget requested, and the estimated timelines. We could frame this as: “What is your level of confidence that this team will be able to complete this project and its milestones in a reasonable time, and successfully deploy it?” Examples:

A proposal that promises the development of a personal assistant that outperforms existing solutions might be feasible, but if there is no AI expertise in the team the viability rating might be low.
A proposal that promises a new Carbon Emission Compensation scheme might be technically feasible, but the viability could be estimated low due to challenges around market penetration and widespread adoption.

Desirability (secondary) Even if the project team succeeds in creating a product, there is the question of market fit. Is this a project that fulfills an actual need? Is there a lot of competition already? Are the USPs of the project sufficient to make a difference? Example:

Creating a translation service from, say Spanish to English might be possible, but it\'s questionable if such a service would be able to get a significant share of the market

Usefulness (secondary) This is a crucial category that aligns with the main goal of the Deep Funding program. The question to be asked here is: “To what extent will this proposal help to grow the Decentralized AI Platform?” For proposals that develop or utilize an AI service on the platform, the question could be “How many API calls do we expect it to generate” (and how important / high-valued are these calls?). For a marketing proposal, the question could be “How large and well-aligned is the target audience?” Another question is related to how the budget is spent. Are the funds mainly used for value creation for the platform or on other things? Examples:

A metaverse project that spends 95% of its budget on the development of the game and only 5 % on the development of an AI service for the platform might expect a low ‘usefulness’ rating here.

A marketing proposal that creates t-shirts for a local high school, would get a lower ‘usefulness’ rating than a marketing proposal that has a viable plan for targeting highly esteemed universities in a scaleable way.
An AI service that is fully dedicated to a single product, does not take advantage of the purpose of the platform. When the same service would be offered and useful for other parties, this should increase the ‘usefulness’ rating.

Abiodun Adegbajesu

Project Owner

AI Product Manager driving alignment of AI, blockchain governance, and product delivery, leading UX/UI and developer experience for transparent, ecosystem-aware workflows.

View Profile

Hiroshi

Lead developer

Lead developer overseeing modular smart contract design, secure wallet integration, cross-chain workflows, and developer infrastructure for validated, auditable AI-driven blockchain deployments.

View Profile

Account Pending

AI/LLM Engineer

AI/LLM Engineer leading prompt-engineered AI code generation, RAG pipelines, structured output validation, and multi-step reasoning with context-aware, schema-constrained workflows.

Account Pending