ishan900

Project Owner

An AI-native Development Environment for the ASI

Expert Rating

n/a

Type SingularityNET RFP
Funding Request n/a
RFP Guidelines An AI-native Development Environment for the ASI:Chain

Details locked. Check back later to view.
Details locked.Check back later to view.
Details locked.Check back later to view.

Overview

Dear ASI:Chain Team, We propose developing an AI-native IDE purpose-built for ASI:Chain that simplifies smart contract and agent development through natural-language vibecoding. The platform will integrate ASI Wallet for seamless signing and deployment, embed Block Explorer access, and support a local development network for rapid testing. Designed for DevNet, TestNet, and MainNet V1 readiness, the IDE will align with Casper3, cross-chain bridging, and upcoming compute and Agentverse infrastructure. Our solution focuses on performance, usability, traceability, and deep ecosystem integration to accelerate builder adoption and ecosystem growth. Best

RFP Guidelines

Open for Proposals

An AI-native Development Environment for...

Ending on:

13 Feb. 2026

Days

Hours

Minutes

Type SingularityNET RFP
Total RFP Funding $50,000 USD
Proposals 21
Awarded Projects n/a

SingularityNET

Feb. 4, 2026

View RFP

This RFP seeks proposals for the development of an AI-native Development Environment (IDE) that improves the efficiency and accessibility of blockchain application development for the ASI:Chain.

Proposal Description

Proposal Details Locked…

In order to protect this proposal from being copied, all details are hidden until the end of the submission period. Please come back later to see all details.

Total Milestones
1
Total Budget
$50,000_USD
Last Updated
11 Feb 2026

Milestone 1 - End to-End AI-Native Development Environment

Description

Design, develop, test, and deliver a fully functional AI-native Development Environment (IDE) deeply integrated with the ASI:Chain ecosystem, ready for DevNet/TestNet usage and extensible toward MainNet V1.

Deliverables

Core IDE Infrastructure • Web-based, modular IDE architecture • Local ASI:Chain development network (sandbox node) • DevNet & TestNet connectivity • Deployment pipeline integration • Built-in logging and traceability system • Comprehensive technical documentation ASI Ecosystem Integrations • Native ASI Wallet integration (transaction signing, account management) • Block Explorer integration within IDE • Smart contract templates tailored to ASI:Chain • Rust node support (upcoming ASI node version readiness) • Hooks for compute, AgentVerse, and Hyperon modules AI Vibecoding Engine • Natural language interface for smart contract generation • AI-assisted contract scaffolding and deployment • Context-aware code completion trained on ASI:Chain docs & GitHub • Automated debugging and testing support • Optimization suggestions (performance & cost efficiency)

Budget

$50,000 USD

Success Criterion

Cross-Chain & Infrastructure Readiness • Framework for cross-chain bridging (Axelar, Wormhole compatible architecture) • Integration-ready modules for hybrid deployment (Ethereum, Cosmos, Cardano) • Optional ASI-Cloud compute and inference integration hooks Demonstration & Validation • Live demo of IDE workflow • Natural language → smart contract generation → deployment • Wallet signing and transaction execution • Sample dApp running on ASI:Chain • Final technical walkthrough and documentation handover Expected Outcome A production-ready AI-native blockchain development environment that: • Simplifies ASI:Chain app development through vibecoding • Reduces onboarding friction for multi-chain developers • Integrates wallet, explorer, deployment, and AI tooling in one unified platform • Accelerates ecosystem adoption ahead of MainNet V1 Budget Total Fixed Cost: $50,000 Includes architecture design, development, AI integration, testing, documentation, demo delivery, and deployment support.

Join the Discussion (0)

Expert Ratings

Reviews & Ratings

No Reviews Avaliable

Check back later by refreshing the page.

The weighted average of the 4 perspectives Overall

0.0
Each RFP defines a maximum allowed budget, but teams can differentiate their proposal by offering a solution with a lower budget or a wider scope.Value for money

0.0
This rating indicates compliance to 'Must haves' but also adaptation of 'Nice to haves' and Non-functional requirements defined in the RFP.Compliance with RFP requirements

0.0
RFPs will offer varying degrees of freedom. This rating indicates the quality of the team's specific solution ideas, the provided details, and the reviewer's confidence in the team's ability to execute.Solution details and team expertise

0.0

Review Headline

0 /50 chars

Review Summary

0 /5000 chars

The weighted average of the 4 perspectives Overall

0.0
Each RFP defines a maximum allowed budget, but teams can differentiate their proposal by offering a solution with a lower budget or a wider scope.Value for money

0.0
This rating indicates compliance to 'Must haves' but also adaptation of 'Nice to haves' and Non-functional requirements defined in the RFP.Compliance with RFP requirements

0.0
RFPs will offer varying degrees of freedom. This rating indicates the quality of the team's specific solution ideas, the provided details, and the reviewer's confidence in the team's ability to execute.Solution details and team expertise

0.0

Review Headline

0 /50 chars

0 /5000 chars

Warning: Adding final group rating for this project will prevent expert users from adding new or editing existing reviews

Reviews and Ratings in Deep Funding are structured in 4 categories. This will ensure that the reviewer takes all these perspectives into account in their assessment and it will make it easier to compare different projects on their strengths and weaknesses. Overall (Primary) This is an average of the 4 perspectives. At the start of this new process, we are assigning an equal weight to all categories, but over time we might change this and make some categories more important than others in the overall score. (This may even be done retroactively). Feasibility (secondary) This represents the user\'s assessment of whether the proposed project is theoretically possible and if it is deemed feasible. E.g. A proposal for nuclear fission might be theoretically possible, but it doesn’t look very feasible in the context of Deep Funding. Viability (secondary) This category is somewhat similar to Feasibility, but it interprets the feasibility against factors such as the size and experience of the team, the budget requested, and the estimated timelines. We could frame this as: “What is your level of confidence that this team will be able to complete this project and its milestones in a reasonable time, and successfully deploy it?” Examples:

A proposal that promises the development of a personal assistant that outperforms existing solutions might be feasible, but if there is no AI expertise in the team the viability rating might be low.
A proposal that promises a new Carbon Emission Compensation scheme might be technically feasible, but the viability could be estimated low due to challenges around market penetration and widespread adoption.

Desirability (secondary) Even if the project team succeeds in creating a product, there is the question of market fit. Is this a project that fulfills an actual need? Is there a lot of competition already? Are the USPs of the project sufficient to make a difference? Example:

Creating a translation service from, say Spanish to English might be possible, but it\'s questionable if such a service would be able to get a significant share of the market

Usefulness (secondary) This is a crucial category that aligns with the main goal of the Deep Funding program. The question to be asked here is: “To what extent will this proposal help to grow the Decentralized AI Platform?” For proposals that develop or utilize an AI service on the platform, the question could be “How many API calls do we expect it to generate” (and how important / high-valued are these calls?). For a marketing proposal, the question could be “How large and well-aligned is the target audience?” Another question is related to how the budget is spent. Are the funds mainly used for value creation for the platform or on other things? Examples:

A metaverse project that spends 95% of its budget on the development of the game and only 5 % on the development of an AI service for the platform might expect a low ‘usefulness’ rating here.

A marketing proposal that creates t-shirts for a local high school, would get a lower ‘usefulness’ rating than a marketing proposal that has a viable plan for targeting highly esteemed universities in a scaleable way.
An AI service that is fully dedicated to a single product, does not take advantage of the purpose of the platform. When the same service would be offered and useful for other parties, this should increase the ‘usefulness’ rating.

ishan900

Project Owner

1 Solution Architect, 1 Senior Blockchain Dev, 1 AI/ML Engineer, 1 Full-Stack Dev, 1 DevOps Engineer, and 1 QA/Docs Specialist delivering end-to-end IDE, AI integration, deployment, and testing.

View Profile

PROJECTS

Rounds

RFPS

Deep Projects

Collaborations

AI PLATFORM

An AI-native Development Environment for the ASI

ishan900

An AI-native Development Environment for the ASI

Expert Rating

Overview

RFP Guidelines

An AI-native Development Environment for...

SingularityNET

An AI-native Development Environment for the ASI:Chain

SingularityNET

Proposal Description

Proposal Details Locked…

Proposal Video

Not Avaliable Yet

1

$50,000_USD

11 Feb 2026

Milestone 1 - End to-End AI-Native Development Environment

Description

Deliverables

Budget

Success Criterion

Join the Discussion (0)

Expert Ratings

No Reviews Avaliable

ishan900

Account Pending

PROJECTS

ROUND

RFPS

DEEP Projects

COLLABORATIONS

AI PLATFORM

Welcome to our website!

An AI-native Development Environment for the ASI

ishan900

An AI-native Development Environment for the ASI

Expert Rating

Overview

RFP Guidelines

An AI-native Development Environment for...

SingularityNET

An AI-native Development Environment for the ASI:Chain

SingularityNET

Proposal Description

Proposal Details Locked…

Proposal Video

Not Avaliable Yet

1

$50,000 USD

11 Feb 2026

Milestone 1 - End to-End AI-Native Development Environment

Description

Deliverables

Budget

Success Criterion

Join the Discussion (0)

Expert Ratings

No Reviews Avaliable

ishan900

Account Pending

Receive notifications on Deep Funding

PROJECTS

ROUND

RFPS

DEEP Projects

COLLABORATIONS

AI PLATFORM

Welcome to our website!

Forget your Password

Password Reset Link Sent!

$50,000_USD