Jahangeer Ansari

Project Owner

Aaru Pool – DEX Fund for AI Agents

Expert Rating

n/a

Type SingularityNET RFP
Funding Request $50,000 USD
RFP Guidelines An AI-native Development Environment for the ASI:Chain

Overview

Aaru Pool: AI-Native IDE + DEX Funds for ASI:Chain AI Agents ($50k) Vibecode in natural language: "Build DEX fund where my trading agent manages pool, pays 25% APY from 0.3% fees, burns 30%." IDE generates, deploys, and runs autonomous AI agent fund. Full ASI wallet integration, block explorer, local DevNet. Trained on ASI docs + MeTTa. Proven on live u-Dex/Topi.AI (TVL flywheel, staking, 113k users). Turns agents into capital managers — explosive adoption driver. MVP + demo in 16 weeks. Perfect RFP fit.

RFP Guidelines

Open for Proposals

An AI-native Development Environment for...

Ending on:

13 Feb. 2026

Days

Hours

Minutes

Type SingularityNET RFP
Total RFP Funding $50,000 USD
Proposals 21
Awarded Projects n/a

SingularityNET

Feb. 4, 2026

View RFP

This RFP seeks proposals for the development of an AI-native Development Environment (IDE) that improves the efficiency and accessibility of blockchain application development for the ASI:Chain.

Proposal Description

Our Team

Jay Ansari leads development, backed by U-Topia core team (live u-Dex + Topi.AI with 113k users).
Tyler Leonard (Web3/Market Making),
Ian Stirling (Revenue/Tokenomics).

Proven in shipping production DEX, AI agents, staking vaults, and autonomous treasury models.
Previous work include building a neo crypto banking solution: U-topia.com

Company Name (if applicable)

Aaru Pool

Project details

Proposal Summary: Aaru Pool – AI-Native IDE for ASI:Chain with Integrated DEX Fund for AI Agents

Project Title: Aaru Pool: Vibecoding IDE + Autonomous DEX Fund Platform for ASI:Chain AI Agents

Requested Funding: $50,000 USD (full scope, milestone-based)

Team: Jahangeer (Jay) Ansari & U-Topia Core Team (DEX builders, AI agent developers, tokenomics experts with live u-Dex / Topi.AI product)

Core Vision & Alignment with RFP

Aaru Pool delivers a complete AI-native Development Environment for ASI:Chain that directly addresses the RFP's must-haves while introducing a groundbreaking innovation: autonomous DEX Funds for AI Agents.

Natural Language Vibecoding Interface (built on our production Topi.AI Telegram agent): Developers (or non-coders) describe in plain English what they want — "Create a liquidity pool where my trading agent auto-rebalances between ASI tokens and stablecoins, rewards stakers 25% APY from fees, and burns 30% into treasury" — and the IDE generates, tests, deploys, and monitors the full smart contract + agent logic.
ASI Wallet Integration: Seamless signing, deployment, and cross-chain bridging (leveraging our existing uBank account abstraction and multi-chain experience).
Block Explorer & Local DevNet: Real-time visibility into agent actions, transactions, and fund performance directly in the IDE; local ASI:Chain fork for rapid offline iteration.
Deep ASI Ecosystem Integration: Trained on ASI:Chain docs, MeTTa, Hyperon, and Agentverse patterns so agents built in Aaru Pool can natively interact with compute brokering, data indexing, and the upcoming agent marketplace.

The Killer Feature: DEX Fund for AI Agents

We are not building just another IDE — we are building the first unified environment where AI agents become fund managers.

Using our battle-tested u-Dex treasury model (live on Topi.AI with swap fees → staking rewards → TVL flywheel → community incentives):

AI Agents as Fund Operators: Agents created in the IDE can autonomously manage liquidity pools, execute strategies, distribute yields, and enforce governance rules.
Vibecoding Fund Creation: "Build me a DEX fund that lets 100 AI agents stake ASI tokens, trade against a shared pool, earn from 0.3% fees, and auto-burn 30% to reduce supply."
Agent-to-Agent Economy: Funds become composable — one agent can join another's fund, delegate compute, or co-manage cross-chain liquidity.
TVL & Adoption Flywheel: Staking rewards, performance fees (up to 10%), and ecosystem incentives drive locked value and agent participation, exactly as proven in our $UCOIN model.

This turns ASI:Chain from "build dApps" into "launch your own AI-managed decentralized hedge fund in minutes" — massively accelerating developer and enterprise adoption.

Why We Are Uniquely Positioned

Proven DEX + AI Product: u-Dex / Topi.AI is live with Telegram AI trading agent, Kaito-powered sentiment, cross-chain bridging, staking vaults, and a working treasury model that rewards users up to 25% on transactions while building TVL.
Tokenomics Expertise: $UCOIN whitepaper details deflationary burns (75% supply reduction planned), tiered staking, referral systems, and real-world rewards catalog — all transferable to ASI:Chain agents.
Developer Tools Track Record: We ship intuitive Web2.5 experiences (Telegram bot onboarding 113k+ KYC users) and are already integrating AI for code generation and market analysis.

Deliverables (Within 12–16 Weeks)

MVP IDE with vibecoding → ASI:Chain contract/agent generation.
DEX Fund Module — deployable autonomous fund templates.
Live Demo: Sample AI agent that manages a small DEX fund on DevNet/Testnet.
Documentation, Tutorials, and Open-Source Repo.
Optional: Early ASI-Cloud inference integration for agent intelligence.

Budget Allocation (highly efficient — we reuse existing Topi.AI components):

Core IDE + Vibecoding Engine: $22k
DEX Fund Smart Contracts & Agent Integration: $15k
Testing, Explorer, Wallet, Demo App: $8k
Documentation & Community Assets: $5k

Timeline & Milestones:

Week 4: Vibecoding prototype + basic contract generation.
Week 8: Full DEX Fund deployment + agent management.
Week 12: Integrated IDE with wallet/explorer + live demo on ASI:Chain.
Week 16: Polish, docs, and public launch.

Aaru Pool doesn't just lower the barrier to building on ASI:Chain — it creates an entirely new primitive: AI agents that own and grow decentralized capital. This is the missing piece that turns the ASI agent economy from theory into explosive, real-world adoption.

We are ready to build it. Let's make ASI:Chain the home of autonomous AI finance.

Submitter: Jahangeer (Jay) Ansari Project: Aaru Pool (powered by U-Topia / Topi.AI tech stack) Contact: +85297403459

Open Source Licensing

MIT - Massachusetts Institute of Technology License

MIT License

The full IDE, vibecoding engine, DEX Fund contracts, and agent templates will be fully open-sourced under MIT to drive community adoption and contributions on ASI:Chain. No exceptions — everything built in this grant will be public from day one.

Background & Experience

Jay built live DEX infrastructure and AI trading agents at U-Topia (Topi.AI Telegram bot). Team has deep expertise in blockchain dev tools, intuitive UX (Web2.5 onboarding), AI model integration (Kaito sentiment, agent automation), and token economies with proven TVL flywheels and fee → reward mechanisms.

We ship fast and focus on real adoption.

Links and references

Project Deck: https://www.canva.com/design/DAHAW01WF9w/z3CEN8NQGcGI3DjtJgQNXA/view

Jay X account: https://x.com/ja3eth

Activity Summary

Milestones

4

Total

Discussion

0

Total Comments

Reviews

0

Total Posted

Project Team

1

Total People

Total Milestones
4
Total Budget
$50,000_USD
Last Updated
13 Feb 2026

Milestone 1 - Vibecoding Engine + Core IDE

Description

Build the natural language vibecoding interface and core IDE framework trained on ASI:Chain documentation. Enable users to describe smart contracts and agents in plain English and auto-generate code.

Deliverables

Working web-based IDE with vibecoding chat, code generation, syntax highlighting, and basic compilation for ASI:Chain contracts.

Budget

$15,000 USD

Success Criterion

Users can type a natural language prompt (e.g. “Create a simple ERC-20 token”) and receive correct, compilable ASI:Chain code. Demo video + internal test report delivered.

Milestone 2 - ASI Integrations (Wallet, Explorer, LocalNet)

Description

Integrate ASI Wallet for signing/deployment, connect to ASI Block Explorer, and implement a local ASI:Chain development network.

Deliverables

Full wallet connection, one-click deployment, real-time explorer view inside the IDE, and downloadable local DevNet.

Budget

$12,000 USD

Success Criterion

Successful deployment and transaction viewing of a sample contract directly from the IDE using ASI Wallet on DevNet. All features tested and documented.

Milestone 3 - DEX Fund Module for AI Agents

Description

Develop the autonomous DEX Fund system where AI agents can manage liquidity pools, staking rewards, fee distribution, and token burns.

Deliverables

Vibecoding templates for creating AI-managed DEX funds + working agent that autonomously runs a fund (swap fees → rewards → burn).

Budget

$13,000 USD

Success Criterion

End-to-end demo: User vibecodes a fund → deploys it → AI agent manages it live on testnet with visible TVL, rewards, and burns.

Milestone 4 - Full Integration, Polish & Public Launch

Description

Complete integration, testing, documentation, and public release of the full Aaru Pool IDE.

Deliverables

Polished IDE, comprehensive docs, tutorial videos, GitHub repo (MIT license), and public demo app.

Budget

$10,000 USD

Success Criterion

Public launch on ASI:Chain community channels with working product, full documentation, and at least one successful external developer deployment.

Join the Discussion (0)

Expert Ratings

Reviews & Ratings

No Reviews Avaliable

Check back later by refreshing the page.

The weighted average of the 4 perspectives Overall

0.0
Each RFP defines a maximum allowed budget, but teams can differentiate their proposal by offering a solution with a lower budget or a wider scope.Value for money

0.0
This rating indicates compliance to 'Must haves' but also adaptation of 'Nice to haves' and Non-functional requirements defined in the RFP.Compliance with RFP requirements

0.0
RFPs will offer varying degrees of freedom. This rating indicates the quality of the team's specific solution ideas, the provided details, and the reviewer's confidence in the team's ability to execute.Solution details and team expertise

0.0

Review Headline

0 /50 chars

Review Summary

0 /5000 chars

The weighted average of the 4 perspectives Overall

0.0
Each RFP defines a maximum allowed budget, but teams can differentiate their proposal by offering a solution with a lower budget or a wider scope.Value for money

0.0
This rating indicates compliance to 'Must haves' but also adaptation of 'Nice to haves' and Non-functional requirements defined in the RFP.Compliance with RFP requirements

0.0
RFPs will offer varying degrees of freedom. This rating indicates the quality of the team's specific solution ideas, the provided details, and the reviewer's confidence in the team's ability to execute.Solution details and team expertise

0.0

Review Headline

0 /50 chars

0 /5000 chars

Warning: Adding final group rating for this project will prevent expert users from adding new or editing existing reviews

Reviews and Ratings in Deep Funding are structured in 4 categories. This will ensure that the reviewer takes all these perspectives into account in their assessment and it will make it easier to compare different projects on their strengths and weaknesses. Overall (Primary) This is an average of the 4 perspectives. At the start of this new process, we are assigning an equal weight to all categories, but over time we might change this and make some categories more important than others in the overall score. (This may even be done retroactively). Feasibility (secondary) This represents the user\'s assessment of whether the proposed project is theoretically possible and if it is deemed feasible. E.g. A proposal for nuclear fission might be theoretically possible, but it doesn’t look very feasible in the context of Deep Funding. Viability (secondary) This category is somewhat similar to Feasibility, but it interprets the feasibility against factors such as the size and experience of the team, the budget requested, and the estimated timelines. We could frame this as: “What is your level of confidence that this team will be able to complete this project and its milestones in a reasonable time, and successfully deploy it?” Examples:

A proposal that promises the development of a personal assistant that outperforms existing solutions might be feasible, but if there is no AI expertise in the team the viability rating might be low.
A proposal that promises a new Carbon Emission Compensation scheme might be technically feasible, but the viability could be estimated low due to challenges around market penetration and widespread adoption.

Desirability (secondary) Even if the project team succeeds in creating a product, there is the question of market fit. Is this a project that fulfills an actual need? Is there a lot of competition already? Are the USPs of the project sufficient to make a difference? Example:

Creating a translation service from, say Spanish to English might be possible, but it\'s questionable if such a service would be able to get a significant share of the market

Usefulness (secondary) This is a crucial category that aligns with the main goal of the Deep Funding program. The question to be asked here is: “To what extent will this proposal help to grow the Decentralized AI Platform?” For proposals that develop or utilize an AI service on the platform, the question could be “How many API calls do we expect it to generate” (and how important / high-valued are these calls?). For a marketing proposal, the question could be “How large and well-aligned is the target audience?” Another question is related to how the budget is spent. Are the funds mainly used for value creation for the platform or on other things? Examples:

A metaverse project that spends 95% of its budget on the development of the game and only 5 % on the development of an AI service for the platform might expect a low ‘usefulness’ rating here.

A marketing proposal that creates t-shirts for a local high school, would get a lower ‘usefulness’ rating than a marketing proposal that has a viable plan for targeting highly esteemed universities in a scaleable way.
An AI service that is fully dedicated to a single product, does not take advantage of the purpose of the platform. When the same service would be offered and useful for other parties, this should increase the ‘usefulness’ rating.

Jahangeer Ansari

Project Owner

CMO Development Cycle Team & Project Management

View Profile