Q-SAGE

chevron-icon
RFP Proposals
Top
chevron-icon
project-presentation-img
user-profile-img
Prasad Kumkar
Project Owner

Q-SAGE

Expert Rating

n/a

Overview

Q-Sage will thoroughly evaluate modern quantum computing paradigms, such as superconducting, trapped-ion, photonic, and topological, for key AGI subsystems in OpenCog Hyperon (PLN inference, ECAN attention, DAS memory). We’ll map AGI tasks into quantum routines (quantum walks, QAOA, VQE), build a Python SDK for hybrid simulation, benchmark on IBM Q, IonQ, Rigetti, and D-Wave with real-device noise models, and deliver a detailed feasibility matrix, cost-benefit analysis, and integration support.

RFP Guidelines

Explore theoretical quantum computing models

Complete & Awarded
  • Type SingularityNET RFP
  • Total RFP Funding $100,000 USD
  • Proposals 12
  • Awarded Projects 1
author-img
SingularityNET
Apr. 14, 2025

This RFP seeks a technical and experimental assessment of quantum computing architectures in AGI applications. Proposals should explore the practicality and limitations of various quantum approaches — including trapped-ion, superconducting, photonic, and topological quantum computing — in handling probabilistic reasoning, parallel processing, and large-scale knowledge representation. The research could include quantum-classical hybrid simulations and feasibility studies for applying quantum advancements to AGI workloads. Bids are expected to range from $20,000 - $100,000.

Proposal Description

Our Team

Prasad Kumkar — Lead Researcher
• 6 years in Web3 R&D and protocol design
• IBM Qiskit Excellence Certificate
• Passionate about translating theory into practical experiments

Siva Kumar — Quantum Researcher
• Academic background in cryptography and blockchain
• Contributor to hybrid simulation frameworks
• Committed to rigorous empirical validation

Company Name (if applicable)

Chainscore Labs

Project details

Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) frameworks such as OpenCog Hyperon rely on symbolic reasoning (Probabilistic Logic Networks – PLN), economic attention mechanisms (Economic Attention Networks – ECAN), and large-scale knowledge storage and retrieval (Distributed Atomspace – DAS). As these subsystems scale, they face combinatorial explosion: PLN’s inference paths grow super-exponentially; ECAN’s resource allocation is NP-hard; DAS’s graph searches encounter millions of nodes. Simultaneously, quantum computing hardware has reached a critical inflection point: state-of-the-art platforms (superconducting, trapped-ion, photonic, and early topological qubits) now support dozens to hundreds of qubits, with gate fidelities approaching error-correction thresholds. Yet, the field lacks a rigorous, empirical evaluation of how quantum paradigms can accelerate or transform AGI workloads.

Q-Sage - Quantum Architectures for Scalable AGI Evaluation—bridges this gap. We will systematically map core AGI subsystems (PLN, ECAN, DAS) to quantum algorithms (quantum walks, QAOA, VQE), implement hybrid quantum-classical prototypes, benchmark them on real hardware (IBM Q, IonQ, Rigetti, D-Wave, Xanadu), and deliver a reproducible, open-source SDK and a comprehensive feasibility matrix. By the end of the project, the AGI community will have actionable insights into which quantum approaches can meaningfully enhance reasoning, optimization, and memory tasks today, which require near-term advances, and which remain speculative until long-term breakthroughs (e.g., topological qubits) materialize.


We propose Q-Sage, a four-phase research program:

  1. Architecture Survey: tabulate specs of superconducting, trapped-ion, photonic, and topological qubit platforms.

  2. Algorithmic Mapping: reduce PLN, ECAN, DAS tasks to quantum routines (quantum walks, QAOA, VQE).

  3. Hybrid Simulation & Benchmarking: implement and run circuits in Qiskit/Cirq/PennyLane, execute on IBM Q, IonQ, Rigetti, D-Wave with real noise models.

  4. Feasibility & Roadmap: publish a multi-metric feasibility matrix, cost-benefit analysis, integration guidelines, and an open-source Python SDK.

Research Objectives

  • O1: Formal Reduction of AGI Subsystems to Quantum Routines.

    • Translate PLN’s logical inference into quantum walk search problems and amplitude-amplification circuits.

    • Express ECAN’s attention allocation as QUBO (Quadratic Unconstrained Binary Optimization) instances for QAOA or as Ising models for quantum annealing.

    • Model DAS’s pattern matching and subgraph isomorphism queries as quantum associative memory or continuous-time quantum walk on large graphs.

  • O2: Hybrid Simulation & Real-Device Benchmarking.

    • Develop a Python-based SDK (Q-Sage SDK) integrating Qiskit, Cirq, and PennyLane for unified circuit construction and parameter management.

    • Execute hybrid variational algorithms (VQE, QAOA) and circuit-based searches on simulators with realistic noise models, then on actual cloud quantum backends (IBM Q Experience, AWS Braket for IonQ/Rigetti/Xanadu, D-Wave Leap).

  • O3: Comparative Performance Analysis & Feasibility Framework.

    • Quantify resource trade-offs: qubit counts, gate depth, coherence requirements, circuit error-rates, and required error-correction overhead for each mapping.

    • Produce heatmaps and multi-dimensional performance plots comparing classical vs. quantum runtimes, quality of solutions (e.g., inference accuracy, optimization approximation ratio), and cost-benefit metrics.

  • O4: Community-Driven Open Artifacts & Integration Roadmap.

    • Release the Q-Sage SDK under MIT License, complete with Jupyter notebooks, CI/CD pipelines, and documentation.

    • Publish the Quantum AGI Feasibility Matrix summarizing viability by AGI module, quantum platform, and problem size.

    • Provide detailed guidelines for integrating quantum co-processors into future OpenCog deployments, including recommended hybrid architectures and error-mitigation strategies.


Technical Approach

1. Formal Task Mappings

  1. PLN → Quantum Walks & Amplitude Amplification

    • Represent the Atomspace’s hypergraph (nodes = concepts, hyperedges = relations) as the vertex set of a quantum walk.

    • Implement discrete-time quantum walk operators (U=S⋅C, where CC is a coin operator and SS a shift) to explore inference paths in superposition.

    • Use Grover-style amplitude amplification to boost the probability of measuring states corresponding to valid inference chains.

  2. ECAN → QAOA & Annealing

    • Formulate attention allocation as a binary vector x∈{0,1}n, where xi=1 if resource is assigned to process ii.

    • Encode constraints (budget, mutual exclusivity) and reward functions into a cost Hamiltonian HC(x)HC(x).

    • Apply QAOA circuits with pp alternating layers of problem and mixer Hamiltonians (e−iγjHCe−iβjHMeiγjHCeiβjHM), optimizing {γj,βj}{γj,βj} via classical outer-loop.

    • Benchmark on IonQ (full connectivity) for small n≤20 and on D-Wave annealer for larger n≤200.

  3. DAS → Quantum Associative Memory & Quantum Walk Search

    • Use variational quantum classifiers (ansatz circuits) to implement associative memory: encode each known subgraph pattern into a quantum state and measure overlap with query states.

    • Implement continuous-time quantum walks under Hamiltonian H=A (adjacency matrix) to exploit natural diffusion dynamics on the Atomspace graph; measure first-pass hitting times for marked subgraphs.

2. Hybrid Simulation & Execution

  • SDK Architecture:

    • Core modules for circuit generation (QASM translation), noise modeling (Kraus channels, readout error), and result aggregation.

    • Support for multiple backends via adapter pattern: QuantumBackend{IBMQ, IonQ, Rigetti, DWave, Xanadu}.

    • Parameter server for variational algorithms, caching of intermediate measurement statistics, and performance logging.

  • Noise Modeling & Error Mitigation:

    • Calibrate device noise channels using provider-supplied tomography data.

    • Apply zero-noise extrapolation (ZNE) and probabilistic error cancellation (PEC) to improve measurement fidelity for critical runs.

    • Compare mitigated vs. unmitigated results to quantify real-world accuracy.

  • Benchmark Suite:

    • Inference Benchmark: Randomly generated logic queries of varying depth (2–6 inference hops) on synthetic Atomspaces (|V|=64 to 256).

    • Optimization Benchmark: Standard Max-Cut and custom ECAN instances (n=10–30) for QAOA on gate-model devices; larger n≤200 on D-Wave.

    • Memory Benchmark: Graph pattern search tasks using continuous-time walks on graphs with 100–1000 nodes, executed on photonic simulators and IBM superconducting devices.

Q-Sage delivers the first end-to-end, empirically grounded framework for mapping core AGI workloads (PLN inference, ECAN attention, DAS memory) onto quantum hardware. By providing open-source hybrid simulation tools, real-device benchmarks, and a feasibility matrix, we enable AGI researchers to make data-driven decisions about quantum co-processor integration.

Open Source Licensing

MIT - Massachusetts Institute of Technology License

Links and references

Proposal Video

Not Avaliable Yet

Check back later during the Feedback & Selection period for the RFP that is proposal is applied to.

  • Total Milestones

    4

  • Total Budget

    $40,000 USD

  • Last Updated

    27 May 2025

Milestone 1 - Architecture Survey & Research Plan

Description

During Months 1–2 we will perform an exhaustive literature review and system audit of the four quantum paradigms (trapped-ion superconducting photonic topological). We will collect hardware specs (qubit topologies T₁/T₂ gate times error rates) analyze scaling curves (quantum volume vs. fidelity) and map each platform’s theoretical suitability to key OpenCog Hyperon components (PLN ECAN DAS). We’ll also outline our simulation and experiment strategies (e.g. toy quantum-walk on a mini-AtomSpace QAOA on a small attention-allocation QUBO).

Deliverables

A Research Plan Document comprising: 1/ Tabulated hardware specifications and scaling analysis for each quantum paradigm 2/ Detailed mapping of platform strengths to AGI subsystems (PLN ECAN DAS) 3/ Proposed simulation & experimental protocols with success criteria

Budget

$10,000 USD

Success Criterion

The review is complete when the Research Plan is approved by internal peer review, covering all four paradigms, with clear experiment outlines and evaluation metrics defined for subsequent milestones.

Milestone 2 - Theoretical Modeling & Early Simulations

Description

In Months 3–5 we will build and validate initial theoretical models and small-scale simulations. This includes: 1/ Formalizing PLN inference as a discrete-time quantum walk on an adjacency tensor 2/ Casting ECAN attention allocation into a QUBO and prototyping a depth-2 QAOA circuit 3/ Encoding DAS associative recall as an Ising-model VQE ansatz We will run these circuits in Qiskit/Aer and on small backends (IBM Q 5-7 qubits IonQ 5 qubits) using real-device noise models.

Deliverables

A Technical Progress Report containing: - Pseudocode/mathematical derivations for each QC→AGI mapping - Simulation results (success probability time-to-solution resource costs) - Initial empirical runs on real hardware with basic error-mitigation applied

Budget

$10,000 USD

Success Criterion

Demonstrated prototype circuits for each AGI task achieving ≥50% of the targeted performance metrics (e.g., ≥70% inference success in 20-step quantum walk, QAOA approximation ratio ≥0.7), and delivery of the Technical Progress Report.

Milestone 3 - Hybrid AGI Experiments & Expanded Analysis

Description

During Months 6–8 we will deepen our experiments by: - Running and benchmarking hybrid quantum-classical loops (e.g. QAOA with classical optimizer VQE with parameter shifts) on mid-size systems (IBM Q 15-27 qubits IonQ 32 qubits) - Comparing performance against optimized classical baselines (graph search simulated annealing) - Testing error-mitigation techniques (zero-noise extrapolation probabilistic error cancellation) on quantum-walk and QAOA circuits

Deliverables

An Expanded Analysis Report including: 1. Detailed benchmarking charts (quantum vs. classical) for each AGI submodule 2. Noise-mitigation results and analysis of depth vs. fidelity trade-offs 3. Refined algorithmic recommendations for each paradigm

Budget

$10,000 USD

Success Criterion

Delivery of clear evidence that at least one quantum approach outperforms the classical baseline on a toy AGI task (e.g., 10% speedup or 10% higher-quality solution) and publication of the Expanded Analysis Report.

Milestone 4 - Final Comparative Evaluation & Integration Roadmap

Description

In Months 9–10 we will synthesize all findings into a comprehensive feasibility study: - Build a multi-axis matrix (problem size vs. success probability vs. execution time vs. cost) for each quantum paradigm and AGI task - Quantify logical-qubit overhead for error-corrected operation (surface-code estimates) - Draft strategic recommendations for near-term (NISQ) vs. long-term (fault-tolerant/topological) AGI integrations

Deliverables

A Final Report & Roadmap package comprising: 1. Comparative feasibility matrix and cost-benefit tables 2. Executive summary tailored to SingularityNET/OpenCog decision-makers 3. An integration guide detailing APIs SDK usage and future R&D priorities

Budget

$10,000 USD

Success Criterion

Submission of the Final Report & Roadmap, with all matrices and guides complete, and stakeholder sign-off from the SingularityNET review panel.

Join the Discussion (0)

Expert Ratings

Reviews & Ratings

    No Reviews Avaliable

    Check back later by refreshing the page.

Welcome to our website!

Nice to meet you! If you have any question about our services, feel free to contact us.