Constantin Kogan

Project Owner

TDX: AI-Driven Wealth Creation Platform

Expert Rating

n/a

Type SingularityNET RFP
Funding Request n/a
RFP Guidelines AGI related hardware

Details locked. Check back later to view.
Details locked.Check back later to view.
Details locked.Check back later to view.

Overview

TDX is an AI-powered investment super app revolutionizing wealth creation through tokenized opportunities across RWAs, DeFi, and TradFi. Leveraging advanced AI-driven risk profiling, TDX offers tailored portfolios aligned with user goals and risk appetites, ensuring accessibility and personalized investment strategies for retail and institutional investors. Backed by seasoned founders with multiple successful exits, 85K+ KYCed users, $80K revenue, and 150K+ engaged community members, TDX combines gamified features like Social Boost and Refer & Earn with seamless cross-chain functionality. With a focus on transparency, compliance, and innovation, TDX is redefining decentralized finance.

RFP Guidelines

AGI related hardware

Internal Proposal Review

Type SingularityNET RFP
Total RFP Funding $80,000 USD
Proposals 6
Awarded Projects n/a

SingularityNET

Oct. 4, 2024

SingularityNET

rfp owner

AGI related hardware

Internal Proposal Review

This RFP seeks to explore and evaluate innovative hardware paradigms, ranging from small-scale IoT devices to large, decentralized systems, to optimize AGI workloads in the OpenCog Hyperon framework and handle advanced processes such as cognitive synergy and hyperdimensional computing. The focus is on assessing hardware paradigms and emerging architectures (e.g. neuromorphic processors, associative processors such as TensTorrent’s APU, etc). The goal is to enhance computational efficiency, scalability, and cognitive synergy in AGI systems. Part of this should involve interacting with the Hyperon team who've built the existing and in-development MeTTa interpreters.

View Full RFP

Proposal Description

Proposal Details Locked…

In order to protect this proposal from being copied, all details are hidden until the end of the submission period. Please come back later to see all details.

Total Milestones
4
Total Budget
$80,000_USD
Last Updated
8 Dec 2024

Milestone 1 - Platform Enhancement & User Acquisition

Description

Enhance the TDX platform by implementing new features such as Social Boost Refer & Earn and Investor Lifecycle Management tools. These additions will improve user engagement and retention. Launch a yield aggregation feature to enable tokenized RWA and DeFi opportunities catering to retail and institutional investors. This milestone will focus on refining platform usability and initiating user onboarding campaigns.

Deliverables

1. Deployment of the revamped platform with fully functional Social Boost Refer & Earn and Tap App features. 2. Activation of initial marketing campaigns leveraging partnerships with KOLs and the existing 150K+ social community. 3. Refinement of platform usability and engagement strategies based on early user feedback.

Budget

$25,000 USD

Success Criterion

1. Fully integrated Social Boost, Refer & Earn, and yield aggregation features. 2. Achieve 25,000 registered users within three months. 3. Secure $50M in Total Value Locked (TVL). 4. Attain a monthly retention rate of at least 60%.

Milestone 2 - Yield Aggregator and Ecosystem Growth

Description

Introduce the Yield Aggregator feature integrating with leading DeFi protocols to provide secure optimized returns for retail investors. Focus on expanding partnerships to ensure the availability of high-yield opportunities. This milestone also sets the groundwork for broader user adoption through targeted campaigns and ecosystem collaborations.

Deliverables

1. Integration of top-tier DeFi protocols (e.g. Base Ethereum) into the Yield Aggregator. 2. Partnerships with vetted yield platforms to ensure security and transparency. 3. Launch of educational content to help users understand yield aggregation strategies.

Budget

$20,000 USD

Success Criterion

1. Achieve 50,000 registered users by the end of this phase. 2. Reach $200M in Total Value Locked (TVL). 3. Enhance user engagement with a DAU/MAU ratio exceeding 30%.

Milestone 3 - AI-Driven Personalization and Mobile Accessibility

Description

Deploy AI-powered Robo-Advisors to offer personalized investment strategies based on user risk profiles and financial goals. Launch the TDX mobile app to enhance accessibility and provide a seamless user experience. This phase will also include the introduction of auto-investment tools for simplified portfolio management.

Deliverables

1. Full deployment of AI Robo-Advisors with tailored portfolio recommendations. 2. Launch of the TDX mobile app across iOS and Android platforms. 3. Implementation of auto-investment features to streamline user participation in investment opportunities.

Budget

$20,000 USD

Success Criterion

1. Onboard 100,000 users globally. 2. Reach $400M in Total Value Locked (TVL). 3. Maintain a DAU/MAU ratio of at least 40%.

Milestone 4 - Regulatory Compliance and Governance Features

Description

Obtain regulatory licenses in key jurisdictions including the EU Singapore and Georgia to build trust and enable global expansion. Introduce governance mechanisms allowing TDX token holders to participate in platform decision-making ensuring alignment with community priorities.

Deliverables

1. Acquisition of licenses in target jurisdictions ensuring adherence to AML/KYC requirements and regulatory standards. 2. Implementation of governance features enabling token holders to vote on platform upgrades and strategies. 3. Development of a compliance framework leveraging insights from advisors like Anu Phanse.

Budget

$15,000 USD

Success Criterion

1. Secure $500M in Total Value Locked (TVL). 2. Achieve 200,000 registered users. 3. Ensure 30% active participation in governance decisions.

Join the Discussion (0)

Expert Ratings

Reviews & Ratings

No Reviews Avaliable

Check back later by refreshing the page.

The weighted average of the 4 perspectives Overall

0.0
Each RFP defines a maximum allowed budget, but teams can differentiate their proposal by offering a solution with a lower budget or a wider scope.Value for money

0.0
This rating indicates compliance to 'Must haves' but also adaptation of 'Nice to haves' and Non-functional requirements defined in the RFP.Compliance with RFP requirements

0.0
RFPs will offer varying degrees of freedom. This rating indicates the quality of the team's specific solution ideas, the provided details, and the reviewer's confidence in the team's ability to execute.Solution details and team expertise

0.0

Review Headline

0 /50 chars

Review Summary

0 /5000 chars

The weighted average of the 4 perspectives Overall

0.0
Each RFP defines a maximum allowed budget, but teams can differentiate their proposal by offering a solution with a lower budget or a wider scope.Value for money

0.0
This rating indicates compliance to 'Must haves' but also adaptation of 'Nice to haves' and Non-functional requirements defined in the RFP.Compliance with RFP requirements

0.0
RFPs will offer varying degrees of freedom. This rating indicates the quality of the team's specific solution ideas, the provided details, and the reviewer's confidence in the team's ability to execute.Solution details and team expertise

0.0

Warning: Adding final group rating for this project will prevent expert users from adding new or editing existing reviews

Review Headline

0 /50 chars

Review Summary

0 /5000 chars

Reviews and Ratings in Deep Funding are structured in 4 categories. This will ensure that the reviewer takes all these perspectives into account in their assessment and it will make it easier to compare different projects on their strengths and weaknesses.

Overall (Primary)
This is an average of the 4 perspectives. At the start of this new process, we are assigning an equal weight to all categories, but over time we might change this and make some categories more important than others in the overall score. (This may even be done retroactively).

Feasibility (secondary)

This represents the user\'s assessment of whether the proposed project is theoretically possible and if it is deemed feasible. E.g. A proposal for nuclear fission might be theoretically possible, but it doesn’t look very feasible in the context of Deep Funding.

Viability (secondary)

This category is somewhat similar to Feasibility, but it interprets the feasibility against factors such as the size and experience of the team, the budget requested, and the estimated timelines. We could frame this as: “What is your level of confidence that this team will be able to complete this project and its milestones in a reasonable time, and successfully deploy it?”
Examples:

A proposal that promises the development of a personal assistant that outperforms existing solutions might be feasible, but if there is no AI expertise in the team the viability rating might be low.
A proposal that promises a new Carbon Emission Compensation scheme might be technically feasible, but the viability could be estimated low due to challenges around market penetration and widespread adoption.

Desirability (secondary)

Even if the project team succeeds in creating a product, there is the question of market fit. Is this a project that fulfills an actual need? Is there a lot of competition already? Are the USPs of the project sufficient to make a difference?

Example:

Creating a translation service from, say Spanish to English might be possible, but it\'s questionable if such a service would be able to get a significant share of the market

Usefulness (secondary)

This is a crucial category that aligns with the main goal of the Deep Funding program. The question to be asked here is: “To what extent will this proposal help to grow the Decentralized AI Platform?”

For proposals that develop or utilize an AI service on the platform, the question could be “How many API calls do we expect it to generate” (and how important / high-valued are these calls?).
For a marketing proposal, the question could be “How large and well-aligned is the target audience?” Another question is related to how the budget is spent. Are the funds mainly used for value creation for the platform or on other things?
Examples:

A metaverse project that spends 95% of its budget on the development of the game and only 5 % on the development of an AI service for the platform might expect a low ‘usefulness’ rating here.

A marketing proposal that creates t-shirts for a local high school, would get a lower ‘usefulness’ rating than a marketing proposal that has a viable plan for targeting highly esteemed universities in a scaleable way.
An AI service that is fully dedicated to a single product, does not take advantage of the purpose of the platform. When the same service would be offered and useful for other parties, this should increase the ‘usefulness’ rating.

Constantin Kogan

Project Owner

Operations Manager at TDX, coordinating with partners and investors for the CEO. Oversee operations, drive milestones, and manage key collaborations to ensure strategic alignment and execution.

View Profile

Account Pending

Keithley Campos

Operations Manager coordinating internal operations, serving as a key liaison for partners and investors, ensuring smooth execution of initiatives, and supporting the CEO in strategic deliverables.

Account Pending