Completed 👍

Sudipto De

Project Owner

SingularityNet Marketplace ChatGPT plugin

Project for Round 3
Funding Awarded $39,000 USD
Funding Pools Tooling
Milestones 4 / 4 Completed

Status

Overall Status
🥳 Completed & Paid
Funding Transfered
$39,000_USD
Max Funding Amount
$39,000_USD

Funding Schedule

View Milestones

Milestone Release 1	$9,333 USD	Transfer Complete	19 Jan 2024
Milestone Release 2	$9,333 USD	Transfer Complete	15 Mar 2024
Milestone Release 3	$11,001 USD	Transfer Complete	02 May 2024
Milestone Release 4	$9,333 USD	Transfer Complete	29 Aug 2024

Video Updates

SingularityNet Marketplace ChatGPT plugin

9 February 2024

Overview

Arbiteria proposes creating a ChatGPT plugin to address the lack of information about decentralized AI and the SingularityNet platform. This plugin, funded with $39,000, will provide ChatGPTPlus users with responses related to decentralized AI queries, including information about SingularityNet AI Marketplace listings and the benefits of decentralized AI.

The project aims to raise awareness among both technical and non-technical users in the decentralized AI space. It also serves as a discreet marketing asset, potentially increasing user traffic to the SingularityNet platform and transactions in the SNET marketplace.

The project is divided into four milestones, including building the plugin, incorporating SNET marketplace apps, surfacing specific SNET information, and providing public Beta support. Mitigation strategies are in place in case key stakeholders do not reach a consensus on the information to surface.

The project is open source and may involve voluntary revenue sharing with SNET/Deep Funding for larger or high-risk projects.

Proposal Description

AI services (New or Existing)

Compnay Name

Arbiteria

Problem Description

In the OpenAI and ChatGPT platform, with current prompt lookups there is hardly any information about the concept of decentralized AI and specifically on SingularityNet platform and benefits of decentralized AI: How to use it, How does it create value to the end user, and how it is creating value to the AI community.

Solution Description

We will create a ChatGPT plugin that surfaces relevant SingularityNet AI Marketplace listings when users query for AI solutions.

This plugin will also surface relevant SingularityNet platform key information about benefits of decentralized AI: How to use it, How does it create value to the end user, and how it is creating value to the AI community, etc.

Project Benefits for SNET AI platform

ChatGPTPlus users who add this plugin will see responses to questions like “How do I do decentralized AI?”, etc., surface relevant SNET solutions or frameworks.

Our plugin will for instance, if a user asks, "How do I create a decentralized AI network?", the model may choose to call our plugin API, receive the API response, and generate a user-facing answer combining the API data and its natural language capabilities.

Project Outcome:

• Using the OpenAI and ChatGPT community to make people aware of the benefits of decentralized AI. How to use it. How does it create value to the end user and how it is creating value to the AI community.

• Help increase awareness among the non-technical and technical users in the decentralized AI space

• Serve as a discreet marketing asset by boosting views, generating interest, and thereby increasing user traffic to SNET platform.

• Increase user transactions (buyers/sellers) in the SNET marketplace.

Milestone & Budget

Milestones:

Milestone 1 – Prototype

In the first phase, we’ll be building the basic shell for the plugin, and testing it out.

Duration: 4 Weeks

Cost: USD 7,000 + USD 2,333 (hosting/API)

Milestone 2 – Incorporate SNET marketplace apps

In the second phase, we’ll be incorporating some SNET marketplace apps – cumulative loads – and configure how and when they are triggered.

Duration: 4 Weeks

Cost: USD 7,000 + USD 2,333 (hosting/API)

Milestone 3 – Surfacing SNET information

In the third phase, we’ll work on surfacing more/specific SNET information – e.g., surfacing more documentation, adding sample lookups, vectorized content, etc. – to make sure it makes the maximum impact possible.

Duration: 6 Weeks

Cost: USD 8,250 + USD 2,751 (hosting/API)

Milestone 4 – QA/Final packaging + public Beta support

In the final phase, we’ll run the app through some QA cycles, do the final packaging for delivery/deployment, and also provide public Beta support for a month after launch.

Duration: 4 Weeks

Cost: USD 7,000 + USD 2,333 (hosting/API)

Revenue Sharing

For larger or high-risk projects, there is the option to share part of the success of your project with SNET/Deep Funding. This is completely voluntary but will have the benefit of motivating the community to vote in favor of your project.

Long Description

Company Name Arbiteria (https://www.arbiteria.com/)

Arbiteria’s vision is to create a collaborative, continuously learning community of gig contributors to the AI ecosystem.

AI Summary

At present, most popular AI tools being used widely (e.g., ChatGPT) only surface generic information on the decentralized AI ecosystem – users don’t get a picture of what’s happening, what the major players are doing, how to get on the decentralized bandwagon, what tools are available, what apps can you buy, etc.

Our proposal is to create an informational-cum-marketing plugin for ChatGPT that surfaces information from the SingularityNet ecosystem.

ChatGPTPlus users who add this plugin will see responses to prompt questions like “How do I do decentralized AI?”, etc., surface relevant SNET information (solutions, documentation, frameworks, etc).

This will not only help increase awareness among the non-technical and technical users in the decentralized AI space, but also potentially serve as a discreet marketing asset by boosting views, generating interest, and thereby increasing user traffic to SNET platform and increased users (buyers/sellers) in the SNET marketplace.

Funding Amount

Total Funding: USD 39,000 (USD 29,250 + 9,750)

The Problem to be Solved

Our Solution

We will create a ChatGPT plugin that surfaces relevant SingularityNet AI Marketplace listings when users query for AI solutions.

Project Description

ChatGPTPlus users who add this plugin will see responses to questions like “How do I do decentralized AI?”, etc., surface relevant SNET solutions or frameworks.

Project Outcome:

• Help increase awareness among the non-technical and technical users in the decentralized AI space

• Serve as a discreet marketing asset by boosting views, generating interest, and thereby increasing user traffic to SNET platform.

• Increase user transactions (buyers/sellers) in the SNET marketplace.

Our Project Milestones and Cost Breakdown

Milestones:

Milestone 1 – Prototype

In the first phase, we’ll be building the basic shell for the plugin, and testing it out.

Duration: 4 Weeks

Cost: USD 7,000 + USD 2,333 (hosting/API)

Milestone 2 – Incorporate SNET marketplace apps

In the second phase, we’ll be incorporating some SNET marketplace apps – cumulative loads – and configure how and when they are triggered.

Duration: 4 Weeks

Cost: USD 7,000 + USD 2,333 (hosting/API)

Milestone 3 – Surfacing SNET information

Duration: 6 Weeks

Cost: USD 8,250 + USD 2,751 (hosting/API)

Milestone 4 – QA/Final packaging + public Beta support

In the final phase, we’ll run the app through some QA cycles, do the final packaging for delivery/deployment, and also provide public Beta support for a month after launch.

Duration: 4 Weeks

Cost: USD 7,000 + USD 2,333 (hosting/API)

Risk and Mitigation

Risk

1. Key stake holders do not reach consensus on the information to surface

Mitigation

1. Define an arbitrator at the onset of the project who would take a final call on such matters

Voluntary Revenue

Open Source

OpenAI and ChatGPT plugin

Our Team

Our AI mentors and team ( https://www.arbiteria.com/our-mentors)

We work closely with US clients/partners and have folks from these organizations as advisors and senior mentors. We are creating tools to enable our trainees to learn and use new technologies. Some of the tools currently in development include a ChatGPT based chatbot that summarizes and answers questions from uploaded PDFs in a language of the user’s choice, an app that allows users to upload demo videos of their apps as NFTs, and a code-review tool for trainees to use and mentors to track individual progress.

Activity Summary

Milestones

4

Total

Discussion

0

Total Comments

Reviews

0

Total Posted

Project Team

0

Total People

Proposal Video

SingularityNet Marketplace ChatGPT plugin - #DeepFunding IdeaFest Round 3

26 September 2023

Reviews & Rating

New reviews and ratings are disabled for Awarded Projects

Overall Community

0

from 0 reviews

5

0
4

0
3

0
2

0
1

0

Feasibility

0

from 0 reviews

Viability

0

from 0 reviews

Desirabilty

0

from 0 reviews

Usefulness

0

from 0 reviews

Sort by

0 ratings

No Reviews Avaliable

Check back later by refreshing the page.

Posting publicaly as

edit profile

Overall

Confidence level that the project is possible at all Feasibility

0
Confidence in a successful outcome considering team, time, and budget Viability

0
Market fit - Balancing needs and benefits against competition Desirabilty

0
To what extent will the project help the AI platform grow? Usefulness

0

Review Headline

0 /50 chars

Review Summary

0 /5000 chars

Expert Review

Overall

Confidence level that the project is possible at all Feasibility

0
Confidence in a successful outcome considering team, time, and budget Viability

0
Market fit - Balancing needs and benefits against competition Desirabilty

0
To what extent will the project help the AI platform grow? Usefulness

0

Review Headline

0 /50 chars

Review Summary

0 /5000 chars

Reviews and Ratings in Deep Funding are structured in 4 categories. This will ensure that the reviewer takes all these perspectives into account in their assessment and it will make it easier to compare different projects on their strengths and weaknesses.

Overall (Primary)
This is an average of the 4 perspectives. At the start of this new process, we are assigning an equal weight to all categories, but over time we might change this and make some categories more important than others in the overall score. (This may even be done retroactively).

Feasibility (secondary)

This represents the user's assessment of whether the proposed project is theoretically possible and if it is deemed feasible. E.g. A proposal for nuclear fission might be theoretically possible, but it doesn’t look very feasible in the context of Deep Funding.

Viability (secondary)

This category is somewhat similar to Feasibility, but it interprets the feasibility against factors such as the size and experience of the team, the budget requested, and the estimated timelines. We could frame this as: “What is your level of confidence that this team will be able to complete this project and its milestones in a reasonable time, and successfully deploy it?”
Examples:

A proposal that promises the development of a personal assistant that outperforms existing solutions might be feasible, but if there is no AI expertise in the team the viability rating might be low.
A proposal that promises a new Carbon Emission Compensation scheme might be technically feasible, but the viability could be estimated low due to challenges around market penetration and widespread adoption.

Desirability (secondary)

Even if the project team succeeds in creating a product, there is the question of market fit. Is this a project that fulfills an actual need? Is there a lot of competition already? Are the USPs of the project sufficient to make a difference?

Example:

Creating a translation service from, say Spanish to English might be possible, but it's questionable if such a service would be able to get a significant share of the market

Usefulness (secondary)

This is a crucial category that aligns with the main goal of the Deep Funding program. The question to be asked here is: “To what extent will this proposal help to grow the Decentralized AI Platform?”

For proposals that develop or utilize an AI service on the platform, the question could be “How many API calls do we expect it to generate” (and how important / high-valued are these calls?).
For a marketing proposal, the question could be “How large and well-aligned is the target audience?” Another question is related to how the budget is spent. Are the funds mainly used for value creation for the platform or on other things?
Examples:

A metaverse project that spends 95% of its budget on the development of the game and only 5 % on the development of an AI service for the platform might expect a low ‘usefulness’ rating here.

A marketing proposal that creates t-shirts for a local high school, would get a lower ‘usefulness’ rating than a marketing proposal that has a viable plan for targeting highly esteemed universities in a scaleable way.
An AI service that is fully dedicated to a single product, does not take advantage of the purpose of the platform. When the same service would be offered and useful for other parties, this should increase the ‘usefulness’ rating.

This represents the user\'s assessment of whether the proposed project is theoretically possible and if it is deemed feasible. E.g. A proposal for nuclear fission might be theoretically possible, but it doesn’t look very feasible in the context of Deep Funding.

Viability (secondary)

A proposal that promises the development of a personal assistant that outperforms existing solutions might be feasible, but if there is no AI expertise in the team the viability rating might be low.
A proposal that promises a new Carbon Emission Compensation scheme might be technically feasible, but the viability could be estimated low due to challenges around market penetration and widespread adoption.

Desirability (secondary)

Example:

Creating a translation service from, say Spanish to English might be possible, but it\'s questionable if such a service would be able to get a significant share of the market

Usefulness (secondary)

A metaverse project that spends 95% of its budget on the development of the game and only 5 % on the development of an AI service for the platform might expect a low ‘usefulness’ rating here.

A marketing proposal that creates t-shirts for a local high school, would get a lower ‘usefulness’ rating than a marketing proposal that has a viable plan for targeting highly esteemed universities in a scaleable way.
An AI service that is fully dedicated to a single product, does not take advantage of the purpose of the platform. When the same service would be offered and useful for other parties, this should increase the ‘usefulness’ rating.

Total Milestones
4
Total Budget
$39,000_USD
Last Updated
5 Sep 2024

Milestone 1 - Prototype

Status

😀 Completed

Description

In the first phase, we’ll be building the basic shell for the plugin, and testing it out.

Deliverables

Budget

$9,333 USD

Link URL

Link 1 Reviewer's report

Milestone 2 - Incorporate SNET marketplace apps

Status

😀 Completed

Description

In the second phase, we’ll be incorporating some SNET marketplace apps – cumulative loads – and configure how and when they are triggered.

Deliverables

Budget

$9,333 USD

Link URL

Link 1 Link 2 Reviewer's report

Milestone 3 - Surfacing SNET information

Status

😀 Completed

Description

Deliverables

Budget

$11,001 USD

Link URL

Link 1 Reviewer's report

Milestone 4 - QA/Final packaging + public Beta support

Status

😀 Completed

Description

In the final phase, we’ll run the app through some QA cycles, do the final packaging for delivery/deployment, and also provide public Beta support for a month after launch.

Deliverables

Budget

$9,333 USD

Link URL

Link 1 Link 2 Reviewer's report

Join the Discussion (0)

Expert Ratings

Reviews & Ratings

New reviews and ratings are disabled for Awarded Projects

No Reviews Avaliable

Check back later by refreshing the page.

The weighted average of the 4 perspectives Overall

0.0
To what extent will the project help the AI platform grow? Usefulness

0.0
Confidence level that the project is possible at all Feasibility

0.0
Market fit - Balancing needs and benefits against competition Desirabilty

0.0

Review Headline

0 /50 chars

Review Summary

0 /5000 chars

The weighted average of the 4 perspectives Overall

0.0
To what extent will the project help the AI platform grow? Usefulness

0.0
Confidence level that the project is possible at all Feasibility

0.0
Market fit - Balancing needs and benefits against competition Desirabilty

0.0

Warning: Adding final group rating for this project will prevent expert users from adding new or editing existing reviews

Review Headline

0 /50 chars

Review Summary

0 /5000 chars

Viability (secondary)

A proposal that promises the development of a personal assistant that outperforms existing solutions might be feasible, but if there is no AI expertise in the team the viability rating might be low.
A proposal that promises a new Carbon Emission Compensation scheme might be technically feasible, but the viability could be estimated low due to challenges around market penetration and widespread adoption.

Desirability (secondary)

Example:

Creating a translation service from, say Spanish to English might be possible, but it's questionable if such a service would be able to get a significant share of the market

Usefulness (secondary)

A metaverse project that spends 95% of its budget on the development of the game and only 5 % on the development of an AI service for the platform might expect a low ‘usefulness’ rating here.

A marketing proposal that creates t-shirts for a local high school, would get a lower ‘usefulness’ rating than a marketing proposal that has a viable plan for targeting highly esteemed universities in a scaleable way.
An AI service that is fully dedicated to a single product, does not take advantage of the purpose of the platform. When the same service would be offered and useful for other parties, this should increase the ‘usefulness’ rating.

Viability (secondary)

A proposal that promises the development of a personal assistant that outperforms existing solutions might be feasible, but if there is no AI expertise in the team the viability rating might be low.
A proposal that promises a new Carbon Emission Compensation scheme might be technically feasible, but the viability could be estimated low due to challenges around market penetration and widespread adoption.

Desirability (secondary)

Example:

Creating a translation service from, say Spanish to English might be possible, but it\'s questionable if such a service would be able to get a significant share of the market

Usefulness (secondary)

A metaverse project that spends 95% of its budget on the development of the game and only 5 % on the development of an AI service for the platform might expect a low ‘usefulness’ rating here.

A marketing proposal that creates t-shirts for a local high school, would get a lower ‘usefulness’ rating than a marketing proposal that has a viable plan for targeting highly esteemed universities in a scaleable way.
An AI service that is fully dedicated to a single product, does not take advantage of the purpose of the platform. When the same service would be offered and useful for other parties, this should increase the ‘usefulness’ rating.