We are currently completing milestone number 2, with zoom meetings introducing technical aspects and discussing ideas submitted to Deepfunding. This stage attracted more than 20 people who were excited to participate and exchange ideas and suggestions in DF4. Will complete milestone 2 soon.
Blockchain Cardano proposes to leverage their community management and blockchain knowledge to bridge the gap between the Cardano community and SingularityNET. They plan to achieve this through high-quality video content. The videos will cover introductions to Singularity's AI products and services, as well as overviews and developer tools. These videos aim to educate, engage, and inspire both users and developers, fostering creativity and attracting potential AI developers to participate in Deepfunding.
The requested funding amount is $4,150 to support the creation and promotion of these videos. They outline two milestones: the first involves producing and sharing a series of videos introducing AI applications and Deepfunding, while the second focuses on organizing community activities to engage new developers.
The primary problem addressed is the lack of awareness and interest in SingularityNET among developers. The proposed solution involves creating engaging video content, attracting new developers, and facilitating collaboration within the community.
The proposal acknowledges potential language barriers but aims to mitigate this risk by organizing activities and fostering broader development orientations.
Blockchain Cardano's initiative aims to bring new developers into the SingularityNET ecosystem, potentially expanding its pool of talent and ideas for AI projects.
Proposal Description
Compnay Name
Blockchain Cardano
Service Details
We create Video products with main content:
1. Introduction video and Instructions for using Singularity's AI products and services (https://beta.singularitynet.io/).
2. Video introducing overview, core concepts and tools for developers (https://dev.singularitynet.io/docs/overview/)
Through videos, we want to bring to the community advanced artificial intelligence products and how to use them effectively. We also want to encourage the creativity of software developers by providing AI products as their foundation. We hope that through this, we will find potential AI developers and support them in implementing projects with Deepfunding. The videos we post are a way for us to introduce our ideas, attract the interest of AI developers and invite them to participate in AI applications for upcoming Deepfunding.”
Problem Description
We believe that the Singularitynet platform is a huge opportunity for global developers to create groundbreaking AI applications and benefit society. However, we realize that many developers are not familiar with or interested in this platform. We want to change that by introducing Deepfunding, a project that uses Singularitynet to help AI developers realize their ideas. We also want to connect with the Cardano community, one of the largest and most innovative cryptocurrency communities today. We will create engaging and compelling content to promote Deepfunding, and how developers from Cardano can participate in Deepfunding and leverage the Singularitynet platform.
Solution Description
We will create high-quality videos to introduce users and developers to the SingularityNet ecosystem, where they can explore and use diverse and advanced AI products. Our videos are designed to capture viewers' attention, provide essential information, and foster developer creativity. Videos are moderated by managers with extensive experience in the Blockchain field. Our videos include two main categories:
Firstly, video tutorials about AI products have been provided on the SingularityNet platform. We will post a video every week to showcase a different AI product. The goal of these videos is so that users can better understand current AI applications and have curiosity about other AI products. At the same time, we also want to stimulate developers to build better quality AIs and submit proposals for deep funding rounds of Deepfunding.
Second are videos that provide an overview for developers about the SingularityNet ecosystem, Deepfunding and tools to support AI development. We will explain how developers can participate in the SingularityNet ecosystem, use Deepfunding tools and build AI according to user needs.
In the final phase of the project, we will organize online meetings between developers, with a target of about 15 – 20 new developers participating in the meeting. The content of the meeting is to exchange, answer questions and cooperate between developers on how to build ideas, and prepare for submitting proposals for projects of the next deep funding rounds.
Milestone & Budget
Milestone #1: Phase of attracting developers
Starting period November 1, 2023 to December 31, 2023
- Develop scripts, create content, dub English and build animations for videos and publish 09 videos introducing AI applications on SingularityNet platform. Videos are posted every Wednesday.
- Build scripts, create content, dub English and build appropriate animations to introduce an overview of Deepfunding, introduce developer support tools available on the SingularityNet platform. Publishes 17 videos posted every Monday and Friday.
- Share videos on social networking channels such as Facebook, Twitter, Telegram, etc.
Deliverable results:
+ Publish 13 videos with an average duration of 5 minutes/video posted according to the committed schedule.
+ Youtube channel achieved the number of viewers over 300 views/video, the number of new subscribers reached 100.
+ Develop a group of new developers interested in Deepfunding, with a number of participating members of over 100 people.
The results achieved will be shared directly on our youtube channel and Telegram group, in addition, we have tables to track work progress and have specific completion times for each job. The work done is compiled with a detailed report in the last week of milestone 1.
Milestone related budget:
Content creator rewards: 26 content/52 working hours; $10/hour worked X 52 hours = $520
Video creator rewards: Create 26 videos/78 working hours; $15/hour worked X 78 hours worked = $1170
Reward for voiceover of video content: Voiceover of 26 videos X $10 = $260
Reward for moderators and content reviewers, community consultants: $200
Video advertising on social media platforms is done voluntarily by the team
Total budget: $2,150
Milestone #2: New developers active
Implementation time from January 2, 2024 to February 24, 2024
- We organized 08 community activities on the Zoom platform, this is an activity with a community of new developers attracted by published Videos. This activity is a group presentation on topics of interest, the work being done by Deepfunding and the importance of AI. The activity is carried out with input on ideas and introduction of capabilities that members can perform to form new proposal groups.
- 04 Activities are expected to have 20-30 new developers participating and carried out every Saturday, the activity content is recorded and published on the Youtube channel.
- Activity carried out with the main host on the content presented, the concerns of the developers are expressed by asking questions and contributing ideas about deep funding, ideas and projects that have can be proposed in round 4.
The budget includes:
+ Reward for the host who prepares the activity content: $100 x 8 activities = $800
+ Rewards for active participation activities of developers who contribute constructively through mini games, including $10 x 10 rewards x 08 activities = $800
+ Reward for people who make Public, post and promote videos on Youtube: 50$ X 08 videos = 400$
We are a team with experience in community management, knowledge of Blockchain platform (since 2017), good capacity in video creation and production. We want our Cardano community (https://t.me/StakingADA) to reach out and participate in the development of SingularityNET, There will be new developers for SingularityNET from the community.
Summary
We create Video products with main content:
1. Introduction video and Instructions for using Singularity's AI products and services (https://beta.singularitynet.io/).
2. Video introducing overview, core concepts and tools for developers (https://dev.singularitynet.io/docs/overview/)
Through videos, we want to bring to the community advanced artificial intelligence products and how to use them effectively. We also want to encourage the creativity of software developers by providing AI products as their foundation. We hope that through this, we will find potential AI developers and support them in implementing projects with Deepfunding. The videos we post are a way for us to introduce our ideas, attract the interest of AI developers and invite them to participate in AI applications for upcoming Deepfunding.”
Funding Amount
4150$
The Problem to be Solved
We believe that the Singularitynet platform is a huge opportunity for global developers to create groundbreaking AI applications and benefit society. However, we realize that many developers are not familiar with or interested in this platform. We want to change that by introducing Deepfunding, a project that uses Singularitynet to help AI developers realize their ideas. We also want to connect with the Cardano community, one of the largest and most innovative cryptocurrency communities today. We will create engaging and compelling content to promote Deepfunding, and how developers from Cardano can participate in Deepfunding and leverage the Singularitynet platform.
Our Solution
We will create high-quality videos to introduce users and developers to the SingularityNet ecosystem, where they can explore and use diverse and advanced AI products. Our videos are designed to capture viewers' attention, provide essential information, and foster developer creativity. Videos are moderated by managers with extensive experience in the Blockchain field. Our videos include two main categories:
Firstly, video tutorials about AI products have been provided on the SingularityNet platform. We will post a video every week to showcase a different AI product. The goal of these videos is so that users can better understand current AI applications and have curiosity about other AI products. At the same time, we also want to stimulate developers to build better quality AIs and submit proposals for deep funding rounds of Deepfunding.
Second are videos that provide an overview for developers about the SingularityNet ecosystem, Deepfunding and tools to support AI development. We will explain how developers can participate in the SingularityNet ecosystem, use Deepfunding tools and build AI according to user needs.
In the final phase of the project, we will organize online meetings between developers, with a target of about 15 – 20 new developers participating in the meeting. The content of the meeting is to exchange, answer questions and cooperate between developers on how to build ideas, and prepare for submitting proposals for projects of the next deep funding rounds.
Our Project Milestones and Cost Breakdown
Milestone #1: Phase of attracting developers
Starting period November 1, 2023 to December 31, 2023
- Develop scripts, create content, dub English and build animations for videos and publish 09 videos introducing AI applications on SingularityNet platform. Videos are posted every Wednesday.
- Build scripts, create content, dub English and build appropriate animations to introduce an overview of Deepfunding, introduce developer support tools available on the SingularityNet platform. Publishes 17 videos posted every Monday and Friday.
- Share videos on social networking channels such as Facebook, Twitter, Telegram, etc.
Deliverable results:
+ Publish 13 videos with an average duration of 5 minutes/video posted according to the committed schedule.
+ Youtube channel achieved the number of viewers over 300 views/video, the number of new subscribers reached 100.
+ Develop a group of new developers interested in Deepfunding, with a number of participating members of over 100 people.
The results achieved will be shared directly on our youtube channel and Telegram group, in addition, we have tables to track work progress and have specific completion times for each job. The work done is compiled with a detailed report in the last week of milestone 1.
Milestone related budget:
Content creator rewards: 26 content/52 working hours; $10/hour worked X 52 hours = $520
Video creator rewards: Create 26 videos/78 working hours; $15/hour worked X 78 hours worked = $1170
Reward for voiceover of video content: Voiceover of 26 videos X $10 = $260
Reward for moderators and content reviewers, community consultants: $200
Video advertising on social media platforms is done voluntarily by the team
Total budget: 2150$
Milestone #2: New developers active
Implementation time from January 2, 2024 to February 24, 2024
- We organized 08 community activities on the Zoom platform, this is an activity with a community of new developers attracted by published Videos. This activity is a group presentation on topics of interest, the work being done by Deepfunding and the importance of AI. The activity is carried out with input on ideas and introduction of capabilities that members can perform to form new proposal groups.
- 04 Activities are expected to have 20-30 new developers participating and carried out every Saturday, the activity content is recorded and published on the Youtube channel.
- Activity carried out with the main host on the content presented, the concerns of the developers are expressed by asking questions and contributing ideas about deep funding, ideas and projects that have can be proposed in round 4.
The budget includes:
+ Reward for the host who prepares the activity content: $100 x 8 activities = $800
+ Rewards for active participation activities of developers who contribute constructively through mini games, including $10 x 10 rewards x 08 activities = $800
+ Reward for people who make Pulic, post and promote videos on Youtube: 50$ X 08 videos = 400$
Total budget: 2000$
Risk and Mitigation
The risk involved in this proposal is low, possibly due to the language barrier that limits the attraction of new developers. We organize activities for developers in the region and have broader development orientations with more developer groups.
Our Team
1. Trieu Hong Minh: https//:www.linkedin.com/in/hongminh-mkt-983aa4241/ . An expert in online marketing with 5 years of experience in marketing and communications, joining Blockchain and Cardano since 2018. Interest in using AI in work, research and learning about Blockchain and AI.
2. Do Viet Cuong - t.me/dovietcuong
- Manage the largest Cardano community in Vietnam (https://t.me/StakingADA).
- Lead a proposal funded by Project Catalyst at fund 7
3. Ta Hai Hung - t.me/Gate_Support
Project Catalyst Community Advisor, computer programmer, Computer Expert, video producer.
Review For: Deepfunding news videos, attracting new developers
Expert Review
Rating Categories
Reviews and Ratings in Deep Funding are structured in 4 categories. This will ensure that the reviewer takes all these perspectives into account in their assessment and it will make it easier to compare different projects on their strengths and weaknesses.
Overall (Primary) This is an average of the 4 perspectives. At the start of this new process, we are assigning an equal weight to all categories, but over time we might change this and make some categories more important than others in the overall score. (This may even be done retroactively).
Feasibility (secondary)
This represents the user's assessment of whether the proposed project is theoretically possible and if it is deemed feasible. E.g. A proposal for nuclear fission might be theoretically possible, but it doesn’t look very feasible in the context of Deep Funding.
Viability (secondary)
This category is somewhat similar to Feasibility, but it interprets the feasibility against factors such as the size and experience of the team, the budget requested, and the estimated timelines. We could frame this as: “What is your level of confidence that this team will be able to complete this project and its milestones in a reasonable time, and successfully deploy it?”
Examples:
A proposal that promises the development of a personal assistant that outperforms existing solutions might be feasible, but if there is no AI expertise in the team the viability rating might be low.
A proposal that promises a new Carbon Emission Compensation scheme might be technically feasible, but the viability could be estimated low due to challenges around market penetration and widespread adoption.
Desirability (secondary)
Even if the project team succeeds in creating a product, there is the question of market fit. Is this a project that fulfills an actual need? Is there a lot of competition already? Are the USPs of the project sufficient to make a difference?
Example:
Creating a translation service from, say Spanish to English might be possible, but it's questionable if such a service would be able to get a significant share of the market
Usefulness (secondary)
This is a crucial category that aligns with the main goal of the Deep Funding program. The question to be asked here is: “To what extent will this proposal help to grow the Decentralized AI Platform?”
For proposals that develop or utilize an AI service on the platform, the question could be “How many API calls do we expect it to generate” (and how important / high-valued are these calls?).
For a marketing proposal, the question could be “How large and well-aligned is the target audience?” Another question is related to how the budget is spent. Are the funds mainly used for value creation for the platform or on other things?
Examples:
A metaverse project that spends 95% of its budget on the development of the game and only 5 % on the development of an AI service for the platform might expect a low ‘usefulness’ rating here.
A marketing proposal that creates t-shirts for a local high school, would get a lower ‘usefulness’ rating than a marketing proposal that has a viable plan for targeting highly esteemed universities in a scaleable way.
An AI service that is fully dedicated to a single product, does not take advantage of the purpose of the platform. When the same service would be offered and useful for other parties, this should increase the ‘usefulness’ rating.
About Expert Reviews
Reviews and Ratings in Deep Funding are structured in 4 categories. This will ensure that the reviewer takes all these perspectives into account in their assessment and it will make it easier to compare different projects on their strengths and weaknesses.
Overall (Primary) This is an average of the 4 perspectives. At the start of this new process, we are assigning an equal weight to all categories, but over time we might change this and make some categories more important than others in the overall score. (This may even be done retroactively).
Feasibility (secondary)
This represents the user\'s assessment of whether the proposed project is theoretically possible and if it is deemed feasible. E.g. A proposal for nuclear fission might be theoretically possible, but it doesn’t look very feasible in the context of Deep Funding.
Viability (secondary)
This category is somewhat similar to Feasibility, but it interprets the feasibility against factors such as the size and experience of the team, the budget requested, and the estimated timelines. We could frame this as: “What is your level of confidence that this team will be able to complete this project and its milestones in a reasonable time, and successfully deploy it?”
Examples:
A proposal that promises the development of a personal assistant that outperforms existing solutions might be feasible, but if there is no AI expertise in the team the viability rating might be low.
A proposal that promises a new Carbon Emission Compensation scheme might be technically feasible, but the viability could be estimated low due to challenges around market penetration and widespread adoption.
Desirability (secondary)
Even if the project team succeeds in creating a product, there is the question of market fit. Is this a project that fulfills an actual need? Is there a lot of competition already? Are the USPs of the project sufficient to make a difference?
Example:
Creating a translation service from, say Spanish to English might be possible, but it\'s questionable if such a service would be able to get a significant share of the market
Usefulness (secondary)
This is a crucial category that aligns with the main goal of the Deep Funding program. The question to be asked here is: “To what extent will this proposal help to grow the Decentralized AI Platform?”
For proposals that develop or utilize an AI service on the platform, the question could be “How many API calls do we expect it to generate” (and how important / high-valued are these calls?).
For a marketing proposal, the question could be “How large and well-aligned is the target audience?” Another question is related to how the budget is spent. Are the funds mainly used for value creation for the platform or on other things?
Examples:
A metaverse project that spends 95% of its budget on the development of the game and only 5 % on the development of an AI service for the platform might expect a low ‘usefulness’ rating here.
A marketing proposal that creates t-shirts for a local high school, would get a lower ‘usefulness’ rating than a marketing proposal that has a viable plan for targeting highly esteemed universities in a scaleable way.
An AI service that is fully dedicated to a single product, does not take advantage of the purpose of the platform. When the same service would be offered and useful for other parties, this should increase the ‘usefulness’ rating.
Total Milestones
2
Total Budget
$4,150 USD
Last Updated
11 Apr 2024
Milestone 1 - Phase of attracting developers
Status
😀 Completed
Description
- Develop scripts, create content, dub English and build
animations for videos and publish 09 videos introducing AI applications on
SingularityNet platform. Videos are posted every Wednesday.
- Build scripts, create content, dub English and build
appropriate animations to introduce an overview of Deepfunding, introduce developer support tools available on the SingularityNet platform. Publishes 17 videos posted every Monday and Friday.
- Share videos on social networking channels such as
Facebook, Twitter, Telegram, etc.
- We organized 08 community activities on the Zoom platform,
this is an activity with a community of new developers attracted by published Videos. This activity is a group presentation on topics of interest, the work being done by Deepfunding and the importance of AI. The activity is carried out with input on ideas and introduction of capabilities that members can perform to form new proposal groups.
- 04 Activities are expected to have 20-30 new developers participating and carried out every Saturday, the activity content is recorded
and published on the Youtube channel.
- Activity carried out with the main host on the content presented, the concerns of the developers are expressed by asking questions and
contributing ideas about deep funding, ideas and projects that have can be proposed in round 4.
New reviews and ratings are disabled for Awarded Projects
No Reviews Avaliable
Check back later by refreshing the page.
Expert Review (anonymous)
Final Group Rating
Rating Categories
Reviews and Ratings in Deep Funding are structured in 4 categories. This will ensure that the reviewer takes all these perspectives into account in their assessment and it will make it easier to compare different projects on their strengths and weaknesses.
Overall (Primary) This is an average of the 4 perspectives. At the start of this new process, we are assigning an equal weight to all categories, but over time we might change this and make some categories more important than others in the overall score. (This may even be done retroactively).
Feasibility (secondary)
This represents the user's assessment of whether the proposed project is theoretically possible and if it is deemed feasible. E.g. A proposal for nuclear fission might be theoretically possible, but it doesn’t look very feasible in the context of Deep Funding.
Viability (secondary)
This category is somewhat similar to Feasibility, but it interprets the feasibility against factors such as the size and experience of the team, the budget requested, and the estimated timelines. We could frame this as: “What is your level of confidence that this team will be able to complete this project and its milestones in a reasonable time, and successfully deploy it?”
Examples:
A proposal that promises the development of a personal assistant that outperforms existing solutions might be feasible, but if there is no AI expertise in the team the viability rating might be low.
A proposal that promises a new Carbon Emission Compensation scheme might be technically feasible, but the viability could be estimated low due to challenges around market penetration and widespread adoption.
Desirability (secondary)
Even if the project team succeeds in creating a product, there is the question of market fit. Is this a project that fulfills an actual need? Is there a lot of competition already? Are the USPs of the project sufficient to make a difference?
Example:
Creating a translation service from, say Spanish to English might be possible, but it's questionable if such a service would be able to get a significant share of the market
Usefulness (secondary)
This is a crucial category that aligns with the main goal of the Deep Funding program. The question to be asked here is: “To what extent will this proposal help to grow the Decentralized AI Platform?”
For proposals that develop or utilize an AI service on the platform, the question could be “How many API calls do we expect it to generate” (and how important / high-valued are these calls?).
For a marketing proposal, the question could be “How large and well-aligned is the target audience?” Another question is related to how the budget is spent. Are the funds mainly used for value creation for the platform or on other things?
Examples:
A metaverse project that spends 95% of its budget on the development of the game and only 5 % on the development of an AI service for the platform might expect a low ‘usefulness’ rating here.
A marketing proposal that creates t-shirts for a local high school, would get a lower ‘usefulness’ rating than a marketing proposal that has a viable plan for targeting highly esteemed universities in a scaleable way.
An AI service that is fully dedicated to a single product, does not take advantage of the purpose of the platform. When the same service would be offered and useful for other parties, this should increase the ‘usefulness’ rating.
About Expert Reviews
Reviews and Ratings in Deep Funding are structured in 4 categories. This will ensure that the reviewer takes all these perspectives into account in their assessment and it will make it easier to compare different projects on their strengths and weaknesses.
Overall (Primary) This is an average of the 4 perspectives. At the start of this new process, we are assigning an equal weight to all categories, but over time we might change this and make some categories more important than others in the overall score. (This may even be done retroactively).
Feasibility (secondary)
This represents the user\'s assessment of whether the proposed project is theoretically possible and if it is deemed feasible. E.g. A proposal for nuclear fission might be theoretically possible, but it doesn’t look very feasible in the context of Deep Funding.
Viability (secondary)
This category is somewhat similar to Feasibility, but it interprets the feasibility against factors such as the size and experience of the team, the budget requested, and the estimated timelines. We could frame this as: “What is your level of confidence that this team will be able to complete this project and its milestones in a reasonable time, and successfully deploy it?”
Examples:
A proposal that promises the development of a personal assistant that outperforms existing solutions might be feasible, but if there is no AI expertise in the team the viability rating might be low.
A proposal that promises a new Carbon Emission Compensation scheme might be technically feasible, but the viability could be estimated low due to challenges around market penetration and widespread adoption.
Desirability (secondary)
Even if the project team succeeds in creating a product, there is the question of market fit. Is this a project that fulfills an actual need? Is there a lot of competition already? Are the USPs of the project sufficient to make a difference?
Example:
Creating a translation service from, say Spanish to English might be possible, but it\'s questionable if such a service would be able to get a significant share of the market
Usefulness (secondary)
This is a crucial category that aligns with the main goal of the Deep Funding program. The question to be asked here is: “To what extent will this proposal help to grow the Decentralized AI Platform?”
For proposals that develop or utilize an AI service on the platform, the question could be “How many API calls do we expect it to generate” (and how important / high-valued are these calls?).
For a marketing proposal, the question could be “How large and well-aligned is the target audience?” Another question is related to how the budget is spent. Are the funds mainly used for value creation for the platform or on other things?
Examples:
A metaverse project that spends 95% of its budget on the development of the game and only 5 % on the development of an AI service for the platform might expect a low ‘usefulness’ rating here.
A marketing proposal that creates t-shirts for a local high school, would get a lower ‘usefulness’ rating than a marketing proposal that has a viable plan for targeting highly esteemed universities in a scaleable way.
An AI service that is fully dedicated to a single product, does not take advantage of the purpose of the platform. When the same service would be offered and useful for other parties, this should increase the ‘usefulness’ rating.
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.Ok
Sort by